Clinical effect comparison of hand type and traditional vacuum sealing drainage technology in treatment of hand soft-tissue defects

Xiao-feng ZHANG,Xiao-ling LI,Yi LUO,Jun-wu HUANG
DOI: https://doi.org/10.3969/j.issn.1003-6350.2016.10.045
2016-01-01
Abstract:Objective Through comparing the efficacy of traditional VSD and hand VSD in treatment of hand soft-tissue defects, to explore a relatively good therapeutic solution. Methods A total of 43 patients with hand soft-tissue de-fects, who enrolled into our hospital from March 2014 to June 2015, underwent traditional vacuum closed drainage technique (group A, n=21) or hand type vacuum closed drainage treatment (group B, n=22). All postoperative patients underwent skin graft surgery. In progression of treatment, the drainage fluid was collected, then counted, and cell count was performed. The adjuvant material life, amount of bacteria and postoperative skin graft survival area were compared. Results Average adjuvant material life in group A [(2.3±1.6) days] was significantly shorter than group B [(5.2±1.2) days] (P<0.05). The bacteria count of group A [(5 320 ± 1030) CFU] was significantly larger than group B [(455 ± 121) CFU] (P<0.05). The postoperative skin graft survival area of group B [(97.5±1.7)%] was significantly higher than group A [(90.3±2.6)%] (P<0.05). Conclusion Compared with traditional vacuum sealing drainage technology, the hand type vacuum sealing drain-age effect is a relatively good therapeutic solution, which should be widely applied in the hand soft-tissue defects.
What problem does this paper attempt to address?