Clinical features and prognosis analysis of extramedullary disease in relapsed multiple myeloma

吴梦青,陆敏秋,褚彬,石磊,高珊,付丽娜,房立娟,项秋晴,鲍立
DOI: https://doi.org/10.3760/cma.j.issn.1673-4777.2016.11.020
2016-01-01
Abstract:Objective To investigate clinical features and risk factors of extramedullary disease(EMD) in relapsed multiple myeloma.Methods Totally 41 cases of relapsed multiple myeloma complicated with EMD from August 2008 to September 2014 in Beijing Jishuitan Hospital were retrospectively analyzed,including 20 patients with myeloma in extraosseous organs and soft tissues(extraosseous EMD group) and 21 patients with myeloma in adjacent tissue(osseous EMD group).Clinical features,treatment effect,survival time and prognostic factors were analyzed.Results Elevated lactate dehydrogenase (≥ 250 IU/L),chromosomal abnormalities,13q14 deletion and 17p13 deletion were more commom in extraosseous EMD group than those in osseous EMD group [50.0% (10/20) vs 19.0%(4/21),46.7% (7/15) vs 7.7% (1/13),75.0% (9/12) vs 27.3% (3/11),41.7% (5/12) vs 0.0% (0/11)] (P < 0.05).The overall response rate in extraosseous EMD group was significantly lower than that in osseous EMD group[35.0% (7/20) vs 76.3% (16/21)] (P =0.009).The median overall survival time(OS) in 41 cases of multiple myeloma was 36 months[95% confidence interval(CI):24.3-47.7],the median OS after EMD relapsed was only 9 months (95 % CI:5.3-12.7).The median OS after relapse in extraosseous EMD group was significantly shorter than that in osseous EMD group(5 months vs 12 months,P =0.001).Log-rank univariate analysis showed that extraosseous EMD relapse (P =0.001),serum calcium ≥ 2.75 mmoL/L (P =0.018),ISS stage Ⅱ and Ⅲ (P=0.008),lactate dehydrogenase≥ 250 IU/L(P =0.043) and no response to chemotherapy after relapse (P < 0.001) were poor prognostic factors.Cox multivariate analysis showed that extraosseous EMD relapse[hazard ratio(HR) =3.822,95% CI:1.543-9.465] and no response to chemotherapy after relapse(HR =6.251,95% CI:2.442-15.996) were independent risk factors for predicting the survival after EMD relapse.Conclusion Extraosseous myeloma relapse has poorer prognosis than osseous myeloma.
What problem does this paper attempt to address?