Effect and safety of remifentanil combined with dexmedetomidine during anesthesia of painless endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography in elderly patients

Zheng Gu,Jiayi Zhu,Min Cheng
DOI: https://doi.org/10.3760/cma.j.issn.1673-4777.2015.09.038
2015-01-01
Abstract:Objective To explore the effect and safety of remifentanil combined with dexmedetomidine during anesthesia of painless endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography (ERCP) in the elderly patients.Methods Totally 65 elderly patients undergoing painless ERCP were randomly divided into remifentanil combined with dexmedetomidine group (32 cases) and diazepam combined with dolantin group (33 cases).The heart rate (HR),mean arterial pressure (MAP),respire rate (RR),pulse oxygen saturation (SPO2) before (T0) and after induction (T1),during endoscopy (T2),10 rain after endoscopy (T3),at withdrawal (T4) and at the end of the operation (T5) were recorded; the observer's assessment of alertness/sedation (OAA/S) scale was assessed at T3 time point scores; the adverse reactions during and after operation were observed; the duration of operation and anesthesia,and the patients' satisfaction rate were recorded.Results Compared with those in group D,the MAP,the HR and the RR in RY group were lower from T1 to Ts [MAP:(96 ± 14) mmHg vs (114 ± 18) mmHg,(97 ± 12) mmHg vs (110±14) mmHg,(92±11) mmHg vs (111 ±15) mmHg,(95±11) mmHg vs (111 ±16) mmHg,(95 ± 10) mmHg vs (107 ± 13) mmHg; HR:(61 ± 11) times/min vs (78 ± 18) times/min,(71 ± 12) times/min vs (92 ± 18) times/min,(67 ±8) times/min vs (85 ±9) times/min,(65 ±7) times/min vs (84 ± 13) times/min,(70 ± 8) times/min vs (80 ± 9) times/min; RR:(12.4 ± 2.2) times/min vs (17.9 ± 3.6) times/min,(13.6 ± 1.8) times/min vs (19.8 ±3.3) times/min,(11.9 ±2.2) times/min vs (19.5 ±3.4) times/min,(14.1 ± 2.0) times/min vs (19.4 ± 2.9) times/min,(14.9 ± 2.4) times/min vs (20.5 ± 3.1) times/min] (P < 0.05) ; the SPO2 showed no significantly differences between the two groups (P > 0.05).The incidences of movement,postoperative nausea and vomiting in RY group were significantly lower than those in D group [0.0% (0/32) vs 12.1% (4/33),0.0% (0/32) vs 12.1% (4/33),P<0.05].The OAA/S score was significantly lower and the patients' satisfaction score was significantly higher in RY group than those in D group [(3.3 ± 0.7) scores vs (4.4 ± 0.5) scores,(96 ± 6) scores vs (87 ± 9) scores] (P < 0.05).Conclusion Remifentanil combined with dexmedetomidine in elderly patients with painless ERCP can maintain the hemodynamics with good safety.
What problem does this paper attempt to address?