Th effect of sevoflurane and propofol on laboratory indexes and postoperative cognitive impairment in patients undergoing cardiopulmo-nary bypass for cardiac operation
蒋琦亮,郭震,唐炜,李琼珍,徐美英
DOI: https://doi.org/10.3969/j.issn.1671-4695.2018.12.029
2018-01-01
Abstract:Objective To study the effect of two different anesthesia maintenance programs with sevoflurane and propofol on laboratory in-dices and POCD in patients undergoing cardiac operation under cardiopulmonary bypass. Methods A total of 62 patients underwent CPB for car-diac surgery in this hospital during Sep 2016 to June 2017 were allocated in this prospective study. These patients were classified as ASA Ⅱ or Ⅲ, NYHA Ⅱ or Ⅲ,with age of 22～69 years old. These patients were divided into sevoflurane inhalation group (S group)and propofol intravenous administration group (P group)by using random number table method,31 cases in each group. Patients in S group received sevoflurane inhalation anesthesia given with full screen,patients in P group were given with total intravenous anesthesia induced by propofol,after anesthesia they were collected (T0),at the end of operation (T1),6 h (T2),12 h (T3)and 24 h (T4)after operation with venous blood samples,determination of S-100 protein and serum concentration of element specific enolase (neuron-specific enolase,NSE),and record the hospitalization time,ICU residence time,anesthesia time,operating time,CPB time,aortic clamp time,respiratory recovery time,extubation time,intraoperative blood loss and other operative indexes and POCD incidence of patients. Results The recovery time of patients in group P,duration for anesthesia and sur-gery,breathing recovery time were lower than those of patients in S group (P<0.05),and the cardiopulmonary bypass time,aortic clamping time,extubation time,hospitalization time,bleeding time,intraoperative duration in ICU of patients in these 2 groups had no significant difference(P>0.05). The levels of plasma S-100β and NSE in patients of these two groups were increased at T1-T2 compared with T0. In group S, plasma S-100β at T1 and T2 were (0.82±0.13)pg/L and (0.71±0.10)pg/L respecctively,NSE level was (21.38±2.21)pg/L,(15.99±4.04)pg/L,S -100β and NSE levels were all significantly increased,and patients in group S were larger than those in the P group (P<0.05). There was no significant difference in the preoperative MMSE scores between these two groups. The scores of 24h and 48h MMSE in group P were higher than those of group S (P>0.05),and the incidence of POCD in P group was 12. 90％,which was lower than that of S group (35.48％), the difference was statistically significant (P<0.05). Conclusion Propofol intravenous infusion and seven flurane inhalation all can affect the postoperative cognitive function of patients undergoing cardiac surgery with CPB,and cause POCD,but propofol anesthesia has a relatively low in-cidence of POCD. Meanwhile,the duration for propofol anesthesia,total operating time,respiratory recovery time and postoperative recovery time were lower than those with sevoflurane anesthesia,and the protective effect of propofol was better than that of sevoflurane inhalation.