Abstract:Background: With the increasing incidence of gynecological ovarian tumors, the differential diagnosis of benign and malignant ovarian tumors is of great significance for subsequent treatment. Currently, ovarian examinations commonly use computed tomography (CT) or magnetic resonance imaging (MRI). This study sought to compare the value of CT and MRI in differentiating between benign and malignant ovarian tumors.Methods: The PubMed, Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials, Embase, Web of Science, China National Knowledge Infrastructure, Wanfang, and Weipu databases were searched for published articles using the following terms "CT" or "Computed Tomography" or "MRI" or "Magnetic Resonance imaging" and "ovarian cancer" or "ovarian tumor" or "ovarian neoplasm" or "adnexal mass" or "adnexal lesion". The articles were screened and the data were extracted based on the inclusion and exclusion criteria. The Quality Assessment of Diagnostic Accuracy Studies-2 recommended by the Cochrane Collaboration was used to assess the methodological quality of the included studies, and the network meta-analysis was performed by Stata 15.0.Results: The results showed that the overall sensitivity and specificity of CT were 0.79 [95% confidence intervals (CI): 0.70-0.87] and 0.87 (95% CI: 0.80-0.92), respectively. The overall sensitivity and specificity of MRI were 0.94 (95% CI: 0.91-0.95) and 0.91 (95% CI: 0.90-0.93), respectively. The area under the curve of the CT and MRI summary receiver operating characteristics were 0.9016 and 0.9764, respectively. The positive likelihood ratio, negative likelihood ratio, and diagnostic odds ratio of CT were 5.26 (95% CI: 2.78-9.93), 0.26 (95% CI: 0.13-0.50), and 22.19 (95% CI: 7.54-65.30), respectively. The positive likelihood ratio, negative likelihood ratio, and diagnostic odds ratio of MRI were 8.69 (95% CI: 5.06-14.92), 0.07 (95% CI: 0.04-0.13), and 146.19 (95% CI: 68.88-310.24), respectively.Conclusions: Compared to CT, MRI has a stronger ability to differentiate between benign and malignant ovarian tumors. It's a promising non-radiological imaging technique and a more favorable choice for patients with ovarian tumors. However, in the future, large-sample, multi-center prospective studies need to be conducted to compare the performance of MRI and CT in distinguishing between benign and malignant ovarian tumors.

Differential diagnosis value of multi-slice spiral CT between ovarian and non-ovarian tumor

Value of Multidetector Computed Tomography in Differentiating Ovarian Tumors from Non-Ovarian Masses

Application of CT Scan in Diagnosis of Pathological Type and Origin of Metastatic Ovarian Tumors

Application of multi-slice spiral CT urography for diagnosis of upper urinary tract obstructive disorder in 20 cases

Value of CT manifestations in diagnosis of ovarial cystadenoma and cystadenocarcinoma

Multi-slice CT multi-planar reconstruction in diagnosis of pedicle torsion of ovarian cysts

Systematic review and meta-analysis of imaging differential diagnosis of benign and malignant ovarian tumors

The Value of Multi-slice Spiral CT in Diagnosis of Colorectal Carcinoma

Clinical value of quantitative analysis of contrast-enhanced ultrasonography in the differential diagnosis of benign and malignant pelvic tumors

Comparative Analysis of Imaging Appearances and Pathological Characteristics in the Group of the Ovarian Thecoma-Fibroma

CT Diagnosis of Ovarian Metastatic Tumors

The Value of MRI Findings Combined With Texture Analysis in the Differential Diagnosis of Primary Ovarian Granulosa Cell Tumors and Ovarian Thecoma–Fibrothecoma

Decision tree analysis of pelvic MRI in diagnosis of endometrial cancer with ovarian malignant tumor

The clinical value of dynamic contrast-enhanced MRI in differential diagnosis of malignant and benign ovarian lesions

Analysis of diagnostic value of multi-slice spiral CT in breast tumors

Analysis of Extrahepatic Obstructive Jaundice Based on Multislice Spiral Computed Tomography

[Value of Color Doppler Ultrasonography, Contrast-Enhanced Ultrasound and Serum CA-125 Detection in Differential Diagnosis of Ovarian Masses].

Comparison of diagnostic values between CA125 combined with CA199 and ultrasound combined with CT in ovarian cancer

MRI diagnosis of malignant ovarian tumors

Diagnostic Performance of Noninvasive Imaging Using Computed Tomography, Magnetic Resonance Imaging, and Positron Emission Tomography for the Detection of Ovarian Cancer: a Meta-Analysis

Ultrasonography, computed tomography and magnetic resonance imaging for diagnosis of ovarian carcinoma