A comparative study of fiberoptic ductoscopy versus galactography in diagnosis of nipple discharge without palpable mass

Ming-gang FU,Ting LIANG,Sha LIU,Li-ying GUO
DOI: https://doi.org/10.11675/j.issn.0253-4304.2015.06.10
2015-01-01
Abstract:Objective To compare the effects of fiberoptic ductoscopy versus galactography applied to the diagnosis of nipple discharge without palpable mass.Methods Forty-two nipple discharge patients without palpable mass accepted fiberoptic ductoscopy and galactography, respectively.Taking the postoperative pathological results as the golden standard,the effects of fiberoptic ductoscopy and galactography applied to the diagnosis of nipple discharge were compared.Results Fiberoptic ductoscopy and galactography were successfully imaged.The postoperative pathological result showed that there were 38 cases of space-occupying lesion which included 27 cases of intraductal papilloma,9 cases of intraductal papillomatosis and 2 cases of ductal carcinoma in situ,and 4 cases of non-space-occupying lesion which were mammary ductal ectasia.The diagnostic coincidence rate of fiberoptic ductoscopy for nipple discharge without palpable mass was 92.86%.The sensitivity, specificity,negative predictive value and positive predictive value of fiberoptic ductoscopy were significantly higher than those of galactography (94.59% vs.80.95%,80.00% vs.88.24%,66.67% vs.50.00% and 97.22% vs.88.24%,respectively,P <0.05).Conclusion Fiberoptic ductoscopy could be the first choice for the diagnosis of nipple discharge without palpable mass.Fiberoptic ductoscopy combined with galactography might contribute to reducing misdiagnosis and missed diagnosis.
What problem does this paper attempt to address?