The Impact of Gender on Revascularization Choice and Prognosis in Coronary Artery Disease

孙星河,张崟,刘小慧,董建增,马长生,杜昕
DOI: https://doi.org/10.12014/j.issn.1002-0772.2018.03b.11
2018-01-01
Abstract:To analyze the influence of different genders on the choice of revascularization methods and prognosis in coronary artery disease (CAD) patients.The clinical data of patients in the DESIRE (Drug-eluting Stent Impact on Revascularization) study who underwent intervention were analyzed and followed up for major adverse cardiac and cerebrovascular events (MACCE) from Jul.1st,2003 to Sep.30th,2005.The median follow-up time of 3 809 patients was 540 days.Female patients were less likely to have history of myocardial infarction,smoking,revascularization and cardiac insufficiency,while they were older and had higher prevalence of other cardiovascular risk factors than men.Though male patients had higher proportion of left main stenosis,multi-vessel disease and chronic total occlusion,female gender was an independent influential factor of choosing PCI for revascularization (OR =1.235,95 % CI=1.009 ~ 1.511,P=0.041).In patients with left main stenosis and three vessel CAD with high CAD burden,female tended to have percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) rather than CABG (P=0.016).COX regression showed that revascularization method was one independent protective factors of prognostic status (P<0.001).Among revascularization patients,female patients are more likely to be treated by PCI,which is also true for those with indication for CABG.Patients treated with PCI experienced higher incidence of MACCE during follow up.Female patients would benefit similarly as male patients from CABG therapy,while patients with indication for CABG or diabetes would benefit more.
What problem does this paper attempt to address?