How to improve the pregnancy outcome by optimizing embryo cryopreservation protocol

Yue ZHANG,Yunshan ZHANG,Fengxia XUE
DOI: https://doi.org/10.3969/j.issn.0253-9896.2015.03.021
2015-01-01
Abstract:Objective To investigate how to optimize the protocol of embryo cryopreservation to improve the success of frozen-thawed embryo transfer (FET), reduce multiple pregnancy rate and increase the cumulative pregnancy rate from one oocyte retrieval process. Methods The clinical data of 1 166 FET cycles were retrospectively analyzed and separated into different groups:445 for vitrification and 721 for slow-freezing. The vitrification group was divided into single embryo (28 cy?cles), double embryos (71 cycles) and triple embryos (346 cycles). 0-1 optimal embryo was called O0-1 group (235 cycles), 2 optimal embryos were called O2 group (80 cycles), 3 optimal embryos were called O3 group (130 cycles). The difference preg?nancy outcomes (implantation rate, clinical pregnancy, abortion rate and live-birth rate) were compared between groups. Results (1) There were significantly higher embryo survival rate(98.3%vs 73.1%), embryo recovery rate without damaging (83.3%vs 62.1%), implantation rate(36.8%vs 29.9%), clinical pregnancy(57.1%vs 44.0%) and live-birth rate(47.9%vs 34.5%) in vitrification group than those of slow freezing group(P<0.05). (2) There were significantly higher clinical pregnan?cy rate(62.7%vs 39.4%vs 32.1%), multiple pregnancy rate(37.6%vs 10.7%vs 0%)and live-birth rate(52.6%vs 31.0%vs 21.4%)in triple embryos group than those of the single and double embryos groups (P<0.05). (3) There were significantly higher implantation rate(33.0%vs 27.1%), clinical pregnancy(65.2%vs 48.1%), multiple pregnancy rate(38.0%vs 20.4%) and live-birth rate(56.2%vs 39.2%) in O2-3 group than those of O0-1 group(P<0.05). (4) There were significantly higher im?plantation rate(36.8%vs 26.3%) and multiple pregnancy rate (46.7%vs 21.3%) in O3 group than those of O2 group (P<0.05). There were no significant differences in clinical pregnancy(69.2%vs 58.8%), abortion rate(15.6%vs 10.6%), ectopic preg?nancy rate(0 vs 0), live-birth rate(58.5%vs 52.5%) and preterm birth rate(26.3%vs 14.3%) between two groups (P>0.05). Conclusion Vitrification technology can improve the clinical pregnancy and live-birth rate, and decrease multiple preg?nancy rate. Two optimal embryos in one tube are supposed to be the preferred method for embryo cryopreservation.
What problem does this paper attempt to address?