Advances in Clinical Reasoning Research

ZHAO Shu-guang,WANG Xu-xia,ZHAO Bao-min,WANG Jing-jie
DOI: https://doi.org/10.3969/j.issn.1006-2769.2008.01.008
2008-01-01
Abstract:In-depth research on clinical reasoning has been conducted abroad for over 30 years and many developments have been made in methodology and theory.Three research phases have been identified chronologically as follows: 1.research on the process of clinical reasoning with an attempt to understand reasoning as a general skill;2.research on memory-reasoning related to the amount of knowledge and memory;and 3.research related to different kinds of mental representations.Two views have been concluded.First,reasoning cannot be characterized in terms of variables of general process.Second,expertise is associated with multiple coordinated representations in memory.Different representations may be utilized in different circumstances,but little is known about the characteristics of a particular situation that leads to a change in strategy.It becomes evident that expertise lies in the availability of multiple representations of knowledge.Perhaps the most critical aspect of learning is not the acquisition of a particular strategy or skill,nor is it the availability of a particular kind of knowledge.Rather,the critical element may be deliberate practice with multiple examples,which facilitates the availability of concepts and conceptual knowledge and adds to a storehouse of already solved problems.
What problem does this paper attempt to address?