Eight-probe fluorescence in situ hybridization combined with G-banding technique in children with acute lymphoblastic leukemia

黄燕,刘勇,沈妙娜,陈海雷,黄倩雯,阮嘉钰,林晓英
DOI: https://doi.org/10.3760/cma.j.issn.1007-1245.2020.09.011
2020-01-01
Abstract:Objective:To investigate eight-probe fluorescence in situ hybridization (FISH) and G-banding karyotype analysis in the diagnosis of children with acute lymphoblastic leukemia (ALL).Method:116 children with ALL were tested by the eight-probe FISH (using probes for CMYC, P16, E2A, CHIC2/D10Z1/D17Z1, TEL/AML1, MLL, BCR/ABL, and IGH) and G-banding karyotype analysis.Results:Cytogenetic changes were detected in 75 (64.65%) children of all cases by the eight-probe FISH, involving P16, E2A, CHIC2/D10Z1/D17Z1, TEL/AML1, MLL, BCR/ABL, and IGH, but CMYC not detected. Cytogenetic changes were detected in 31 (26.72%) children of all cases by G-banding karyotype analysis. There was statistically significant difference in the positive rate between the two methods ( P<0.05). Conclusion:Compared with G-banding karyotype analysis, eight-probe FISH technique has the advantages of high efficiency, time-saving, and high sensitivity. However, G-banding karyotype analysis is more extensive. The two have different emphases and complement each other to improve the detection efficiency, provide more basis for clinical individualized treatment.
What problem does this paper attempt to address?