Combined Detection of CK5/6,CK14 and EGFR in Diagnosis of Basal-like SubtypeTriple Negative Breast Cancer

REN Xin-yu,YUAN Li,SHEN Song-jie,WU Huan-wen,LU Jun-liang,LIANG Zhi-yong
DOI: https://doi.org/10.3969/j.issn.1674-9081.2017.03.014
2017-01-01
Abstract:Objective To investigate the value of combined detection of CK5/6,CK14 and epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR) in diagnosing basal-like subtype triple negative breast cancer (TNBC).MethodsThe clinical and pathological data of 115 patients diagnosed with TNBC were recorded from January 2000 to December 2011.The expression of CK5/6,CK14 and EGFR were detected with immunohistochemical methods using paraffin specimens.Combined detection result of the three markers was used as gold standard,then the sensitivity and specificity of CK5/6,CK14 and EGFR were detected by single marker and two combined assays.The differences between basal-like and non basal-like subtype TNBC in age,tumor size,tumor histological type and other clinicopathological issues were compared.Results The mean age of 115 patients with TNBC was (50.7±13.6) years.Immunhistochemical result showed that single marker positivity was 29.6% (34/115),21.7% (18/83),and 60.9% (70/115) for CK5/6,CK14,and EGFR,respectively.Combined detection of the three markers,the positive rate was 67.8% (78/115).Taking three markers combination as a golden standard,the sensitivity and specificity of EGFR and CK5/6 combination were 98.7% and 100%. There were significant differences between basal-like and non basal-like subtype TNBC in histological type,tumor grade,lymph node metastasis and mortality(all P<0.05).Survival analysis showed that the overall survival period of basal-like subtype TNBC was significant shortened(HR=0.363,95% CI:0.139~0.947).Conclusions Combined detection of CK5/6,CK14 and EGFR could identifiy the largest number of basal-like subtype TNBC.The prognosis of basal-like subtype TNBC is worse than that of non basal-like subtype TNBC,and it is important to identify the subtype.
What problem does this paper attempt to address?