How to improve medical students' ECG interpretation skills ? Multicenter survey and results of a comparative study evaluating a new educational approach
Corentin Chaumont,Charles Morgat,Pierre Ollitrault,Celia Brejoux,Fabrice Extramiana,Paul Milliez,Arnaud Savoure,Raphaël Al Hamoud,Hélène Eltchaninoff,Frederic Anselme
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1186/s12909-024-05929-7
2024-09-09
Abstract:Background: Learning to interpret electrocardiograms (ECGs) is a crucial objective in medical education. Despite its importance, errors in ECGs interpretation are common, and the optimal teaching methods have not yet been clearly established. Objectives: To evaluate students' confidence in ECGs analysis and their opinion on current teaching methods, and to assess the effectiveness of a new ECG educational approach. Methods: First, we conducted a survey on ECG learning among fourth to sixth-year medical students. Second, a 5-week multicenter comparative study was conducted with fourth-year medical students during their cardiology internship. Two different teaching methods were used, assigned by center. The first group participated in 5-minutes workshops 4 times a week using a "reversed classroom" method, supervised by a cardiologist, where students took turns selecting, presenting and discussing ECGs. The control group attended a single 2-hour face-to-face ECG course. All participants completed a 30-minute ECGs analysis test at baseline and after 5 weeks. Results: Out of 401 survey respondents, the confidence levels in ECG interpretation were 3/5 (IQR 2-3) for routine situations and 2/5 (IQR 1-3) for emergency situations. Satisfaction with ECG teaching was low (2/5, IQR 1-3) and 96.3% of respondents favored more extensive ECG training. In the comparative study, 52 students from 3 medical schools were enrolled (control group: n = 27; workshop group: n = 25). Both groups showed significant improvement in exam scores from baseline to 5-week (33/100 ± 12/100 to 44/100 ± 12/100, p < 0.0001 for the control group and 36/100 ± 13/100 to 62/100 ± 12/100, p < 0.0001 for the workshop group). The improvement was significantly greater in the workshop group compared to the control group (+ 26 ± 11 vs. + 11 ± 6, p < 0.001). Conclusions: Among French medical students who initially reported low confidence and insufficient skills in ECG interpretation, the workshop approach using a "reversed classroom" method was found to be more effective than conventional lecture-based teaching during cardiology internship.