Clinical efficacy of different therapeutic strategies in patients with spontaneous rupture of the esophagus: a multicenter retrospective cohort study.
Siyuan Luan,Xin Xiao,Xiaoxi Zeng,Jie Ren,Wen Liu,Jiwen Luo,Xinyu Mei,Xinpeng Zhou,Rulin Li,Yufeng Deng,Maoyong Fu,Guidong Shi,Shijian Du,Yunhua Wu,Chong Li,Yuncang Wang,Gang Li,Changjie Yang,Jianfeng Zhou,Chengyi Mao,Weipeng Hu,Longqi Chen,Yushang Yang,Yong Yuan
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1097/JS9.0000000000001911
2024-01-01
Abstract:BACKGROUND:The therapeutic strategy for patients with spontaneous rupture of the esophagus includes surgical repair, endoscopic therapy, supportive care, and others. However, no evidence exists to direct clinical decision-making regarding the choice of operative and nonoperative management. The aim of this study was to determine the clinical efficacy of different therapeutic strategies in both general and stratified patients.
METHODS:This study retrospectively analyzed a consecutive cohort of 101 patients at nine tertiary referral hospital centers in China. Patients were divided into operative and nonoperative groups based on the initial treatment. Short-term outcomes, including 90-day mortality, length of hospital stay, and postoperative leakage were compared. Subgroup analysis was performed based on treatment timing and Pittsburgh perforation severity score (PSS).
RESULTS:Of 101 patients, 60 (58.4%) underwent operative management. A significant difference of 90-day mortality between operative and nonoperative groups was observed (15.0% vs. 34.1%, P=0.031). Operative management tend to yield similar therapeutic benefits in timely (OR, 0.250; 95% CI, 0.05-1.14, P=0.073) and delayed (OR, 0.42; 95% CI, 0.12-1.47, P=0.175) treatment groups. Based on PSS stratification, operative management significantly decreased the risk of 90-day mortality (OR, 0.211; 95% CI, 0.064-0.701; P=0.011) for patients in low- and moderate-risk groups but may be detrimental for patients in high-risk group (OR, 1.333; 95% CI, 0.233-7.626; P=0.746).
CONCLUSIONS:Operative management might be superior to nonoperative management for low- and moderate-risk patients with spontaneous rupture of the esophagus. However, for patients at high risks, operative management might not provide additional benefits compared with nonoperative management. Further research involving larger sample sizes is required for accurate patient stratification and conclusive evidence-based guideline.