Effects of Carbon Source Andbacillus Megaterium on Soil Microbial Environment and N2O, CH4Emission

GAO Lin,PAN Zhi-hua,YANG Shu-yun,WANG Li-wei,XU Hui,DONG Zhi-qiang,ZHANG Jing-ting,HUANG Lei,ZHAO Hui,ZHANG Jun,PAN Yu-ying,HAN Guo-lin,FAN Dong-liang,WANG Jia-lin,WU Dong
DOI: https://doi.org/10.3969/j.issn.1000-6362.2016.06.004
2016-01-01
Abstract:The potted wheat experiment was conducted in September-October 2014, five treatments were set up as follows: regular nitrogen treatment(CK) nitrogen added with glucose (G), nitrogen added with glucose andBacillus megaterium (GY), nitrogen added with straw(S), nitrogen added with straw andBacillus megaterium(SY). Based on monitoring the changes of greenhouse gas emissions, soil carbon and nitrogen environment and microbial flora at seedling stage of wheat, the impacts on greenhouse gas emissions and soil microorganisms for different carbon sources andBacillus megaterium were analyzed. The results showed:(1)there was no significant effect on carbon changes of soil microbial, but the soil microbial species and species diversity decreased with treatment of nitrogen added with glucose(G) and glucose andBacillus megaterium (GY); While the N2O emissions was inhibited as the nitrate nitrogen and ammonium nitrogen were obviously inhibited in addition, the CH4 absorption of upland soil was promoted.(2)The nitrate nitrogen reduced significantly while the changes of N2O emissions was not obvious with treatment of nitrogen added with straw(S) at seeding stage of wheat. So the glucose which could provide organic carbon quickly was better than straw as carbon source to reflect the influence of that the huge bacillus could improve soil microbial flora, reduce the nitrate nitrogen generation and N2O emissions.
What problem does this paper attempt to address?