Phytoremediation of polycyclic aromatic hydrocarbons(PAHs)-contaminated soil by intercropped beet-grasses

Jiao-jiao WANG,Shi-bin HU,Li-qiong WEI,Qin-qin CHAI,Jin-bo LIU,Jia-ying WANG,Wen-xiao YANG
DOI: https://doi.org/10.11654/jaes.2016.06.010
2016-01-01
Abstract:A pot experiment was conducted to investigate removal mechanisms and remediation efficiencies of polycyclic aromatic hydrocar-bons(PAHs)under beet and grass intercropping systems in a greenhouse. Representative PAHs, phenanthrene, fluoranthene, pyrene and benzo(a)pyrene, were used, and four plant species, cash crops(beet)and gramineae(ryegrass, sudangrass and vetiver grass)selected. The experiment lasted 180 days and two harvests were performed. Plants grew normal at initial concentrations of phenanthrene(101.23±6.63) mg·kg-1, fluoranthene(99.79±4.21)mg·kg-1, pyrene(105.41±4.59)mg·kg-1 and benzo(a)pyrene(50.12±7.75)mg·kg-1. The efficiencies of PAHs removal were greater in treatments with plants than in no-plant control, and higher in beet-grass intercropping than in single crop-ping. The reduction of PAHs was 84.85%, 84.11%, and 79.96%for beet-ryegrass, beet-vetiver grass and beet-sudangrass, respectively. Beet plants grew even better when intercropped with other plants in contaminated soil. Soil polyphenol oxidase and catalase activities were enhanced by growing plants, with 4.37%~43.07% higher activities in intercropping system than in single-cropping system. Catalase was relatively more sensitive than polyphenol oxidase to soil pollution, which may serve as an indicator to evaluate the risk of polycyclic aromatic hydrocarbon contaminated soil. Therefore, the present results suggest that grasses and beet intercropping is a feasible technique for phytore-mediating PAHs contaminated soils.
What problem does this paper attempt to address?