Effects of Slow-release Urea on Maize Yield

Jian-wei HOU,Yu DUAN,Jun ZHANG,Yu-peng JING
DOI: https://doi.org/10.13597/j.cnki.maize.science.20180422
2018-01-01
Abstract:To explore the effects of slow-release urea (CRU) on maize, seven treatments, control (CK, no urea application), 100% normal urea (RU), 80% RU, 25% RU+75% CRU, 40% RU+60% CRU, 55% RU+45% CRU, and70% RU+30% CRU, were performed respectively in Chifeng and Ordos cities of Inner Mongolia, China. Results indicated that grain and straw yields of maize applied urea were increased by 13.3%-157.2% and 6.9%-64.2%, respectively, when compared with that of CK, and among CRU treatments, the maize in the treatment of 25% RU+75% CRU got the highest yieldwhich was the same as that in 100% RU. In the treatments of 25% RU+75% CRU and 40% RU+60% CRU, N utilization efficiency, partial factor productivity of applied N (PFPN), and N agronomy efficiency were up to the maximum values, which were more than that in 100% RU by 14.3, 4.5, 61.7% in Chifeng and by 8.4, 11.0, 35.7% in Ordos, respectively. After harvest, N contents in the soil top layer (0-20 cm) of different treatments were significantly different at the location of Chifeng, and the maximum (26.16 mg/kg) and minimum (18.37 mg/kg) values were got in 100% RU and 80% RU treatments, respectively. In addition, NO3--N contents were 3.5-7.0 times of NH4+-N While, NO3--N and NH4+-N contents in the soil top layer were nearly the same (1.85-3.26 mg/kg) among the treatments in Ordos, except that of CK was significantly different from others. In summary, CRU was benefit for maize production, and 20% of the recommended N application amount would be saved when more than 30% of the total N application was replaced by CRU.
What problem does this paper attempt to address?