Best Fertilizer Rate of Different Ploidies Birch Clonal Seedling

Zhao Rui,Liu Zhaoyi,Li Chunxu,Liu Yu,Liu Guifeng
DOI: https://doi.org/10.3969/j.issn.1000-5382.2017.07.001
2017-01-01
Journal of Northeast Forestry University
Abstract:With 19 2-a different clones birch (include diploid and tetraploid) seedlings group, the optimum fertilization formula was used to make 1/1000 nutrient solution irrigated root fertilization for 7d (Treatment 1), 10d (Treatment 2), 15d (Treatment 3), with no fertilization as the control (Treatment 4), and then set same fertilizer concentration to each seedling every time.The test was performed in a completely randomized block design and repeated three times.Fertilization began on May 1 and end on August 31.The investigation of seedling height and ground diameter was conducted from May 15th to October 1st.All treatments birch seedlings growth rhythm showed a "slow-fast-slow" pattern, the growth rate and growth period were increased with the increasing of fertilizer rate, comparing with control, the height and ground diameter of Betula platyphylla grown in fertilization treatments were increased by 42.46% and 32.14%, respectively.There was a significant difference in the growth of B.platyphylla under different fertilization treatments.The diploid height increased by 20.30% compared with the tetraploid, but the tetraploid was obviously coarser.The fertilization of Treatment 1 was 3.71% higher than diploid.According to the average height-diameter ratio and fertilizer rate under different treatment and the labor costs, the fertilization interval of 15d (Treatment 3) was the best choice as the main fertilization scheme.Different clones required different fertilizer rates, the test determined each clone''s precise fertilization rate for 19 clones.Integrated the growth of seedling height, ground diameter under the condition of different fertilization treatments, there were four clones (2Bz3, 2Bz18, 2B353 and 4B44) selected as excellent clones, and the average seedling height and ground diameter were increased by 40.60% and 32.26% higher than the clones without fertilization, respectivly.
What problem does this paper attempt to address?