Ecological Services Evaluation of Natural Forest Resources Conservation Programme Area in Tibetan Autonomous Region

Guo-qiang ZHENG,Jing-sheng WANG
DOI: https://doi.org/10.16473/j.cnki.xblykx1972.2016.06.009
2016-01-01
Abstract:With Natural Forest Resources Conservation Program area in Tibetan Autonomous Region as the research area, based on TM/ETM+data in 2000 and the environmental satellite data in 2010, ecosystem types database in 2000 and 2010 were established after geometry correction, atmospheric radiation correction, and object-oriented classification. According to research achievements of Costanza and Xie Gaodi et al and referring to actual investiga-tion of three counties implementing Natural Forest Resources Conservation Programme, the ecological service value for unit area of different ecosystem types in Natural Forest Resources Conservation Programme area was calculated, and quantitative study on the structure of ecological service value and variation of service value in different ecosys-tem types were conducted. The results are as follows: significant progress has been made in Tibet’ s Natural Forest Resources Conservation Programme area. During the past 10 years, forest land and shrub forest have showed an increasing trend, especially forest area increased significantly, but grassland, alpine desert and glacial snow showed an reducing trend; Ecosystem environment quality has been significantly improved and ecological service value increased 10. 74 ×108 yuan/year. The indirect increasing value is over four times more than the direct in-creasing value, among which, forest and shrub forest ecological service value increased 6. 16% and 1. 59% re-spectively, grass ecological service value reduced 2. 01%;the growth sorting of ecological service type value is as follows: soil development and protection>gas regulation>water conservation>biodiversity protection. The vertical spatial distribution of ecological service value was significantly different. Areas at altitude ranging from 4 100 to 4 500m provided the biggest quantity of ecosystem service value, and also showed the biggest quantity change of ecological service value.
What problem does this paper attempt to address?