Impacts of Intrauterine Growth Retardation on the Development of Small Intestinal Enzyme in Neonatal Pigs

ZHOU Gen-lai,WANG Tian,HUO Yong-jiu,CHEN Cai-yong,SHI Xian-rui,XU Ruo-jun
DOI: https://doi.org/10.3321/j.issn:0366-6964.2005.08.006
2005-01-01
Abstract:To find out the impact of intrauterine growth retardation on the development of small intestinal enzyme in newborn piglets, 14 normal piglets and 14 piglets with IUGR were selected from 14 litters using natural select. They were randomly assigned to three groups: Newborn group (D0), Group naturally suckled for 3 days (D3) and Group naturally suckled for 7 days (D7), and were slaughtered on the end of the experiment. At birth, both of total activity and specific activity of lactase in mucous membrane of small intestine in normal piglets were significantly higher than those with IUGR. Both of total activity and specific activity of aminopeptidase in piglets with IUGR were lower than those in normal ones, and the difference of total activity between them is greatly significant. The total activity of maltase in IUGR piglets was significantly lower than that in normal piglets, but the difference of specific activity of maltase between them was not significant. The difference of alkaline phosphatase activity was also not significant. After naturally suckled with their dams for 3 days, the differences of mucosal maltase and alkaline phosphatase activities between normal piglets and piglets with IUGR were all not significant, but the difference of total activity of lactase and AP was significant. At 7 days age, there were no significances in mucosal lactase, maltase, aminopeptidase and alkaline phosphatase activities between them. All experiment results suggested that IUGR blocked the maturation of lactase and aminopeptidase in small intestine, and resulted in the premature of maltase and alkaline phosphatase. At the same time, it also suggested that the development of intestinal function in intrauterine growth retarded piglet partly realized catch-up growth during postnatal 1 week, and the catch-up growth is step by step with increased age.
What problem does this paper attempt to address?