Comparision on the content of cholesterol in muscle and fat tissue of Hulunbeier Lambs and Hulunbeier×Dorper Crossbreed Lambs

Yang Yu,Shulin Liu,Yinhao Li,Xiaoyu Guo,Sumei Yan
DOI: https://doi.org/10.13302/j.cnki.fi.2019.01.009
2019-01-01
Abstract:This experiment was conducted to compare the content of cholesterol in muscle and fat tis?sue of Hulunbeier Lambs and Hulunbeier x Dorper Crossbreed Lambs. The experiment adopted 2×2 factorial arrangement. Sixty healthy weaned HL and sixty HZ with the similar weight and body condi?tion were selected and then divided into 4 groups of thirty animals each, the first factor was fatting ways (NG vs. GS) and the second factor was breed (HL vs. HZ). The experiment lasted for 60 days di?vided into the early stage of fatting (1~30 d) and the late stage of the fatting (31~60 d). At the end of the trial, each 5 goats were selected from the experiment and control group respectively to slaughter, and to determine the content of cholesterol in muscle and fat tissue. The results were showed as fol? lowed under the present experiment condition:the breed could significantly affect cholesterol content in muscle and fat tissue. The content of cholesterol in triceps muscle and bicep muscle of HZ were obviously or tended to be significant?ly higher than HL(P=0.02, P=0.063), and the content of cholesterol in omental fat, perinephrit, tail fat, mesenteric fat and dorsal fat were obvi? ously or tended to be significantly lower than HL(P<0.05, 0.05<P<0.10). Compared with NG, GS could significantly increase the content of cholesterol in longissimus thoracis and bicep muscle of lambs (P<0.05), and the content of cholesterol in omental fat, perinephrit fat, mesentery fat and dorsal fat of lambs were significantly lower in GS (P<0.05). Different muscles and adipose tissue have different pat?terns of cholesterol changes, and the cholesterol content of muscle and adipose tissue of HL and HZ was different. The cholesterol content of triceps and biceps of the HZ was obviously or tended to be significantly higher than HL, but that of omental fat, perirenal fat, tail fat, mesenteric fat and dorsal fat was obviously or tended to be significantly lower than HL.
What problem does this paper attempt to address?