Abstract:The extract of Chinese propolis (ECP) has recently been adulterated with that of poplar buds (EPB), because most of ECP is derived from the poplar plant, and ECP and EPB have almost identical chemical compositions. It is very difficult to differentiate them by using the chromatographic methods such as high performance liquid chromatography (HPLC) and gas chromatography (GC). Therefore, how to effectively discriminate these two mixtures is a problem to be solved urgently. In this paper, a rapid method for discriminating ECP and EPB was established by the Fourier transform infrared (FT-IR) spectra combined with the two-dimensional infrared correlation (2D IR) analysis. Forty-three ECP and five EPB samples collected from different areas of China were analyzed by the FT-IR spectroscopy. All the ECP and EPB samples tested show similar IR spectral profiles. The significant differences between ECP and EPB appear in the region of 3000–2800cm−1 of the spectra. Based on such differences, the two species were successfully classified with the soft independent modeling of class analogy (SIMCA) pattern recognition technique. Furthermore, these differences were well validated by a series of temperature-dependent dynamic FT-IR spectra and the corresponding 2D IR plots. The results indicate that the differences in these two natural products are caused by the amounts of long-chain alkyl compounds (including long-chain alkanes, long-chain alkyl esters and long chain alkyl alcohols) in them, rather than the flavonoid compounds, generally recognized as the bioactive substances of propolis. There are much more long-chain alkyl compounds in ECP than those in EPB, and the carbon atoms of the compounds in ECP remain in an order Z-shaped array, but those in EPB are disorder. It suggests that FT-IR and 2D IR spectroscopy can provide a valuable method for the rapid differentiation of similar natural products, ECP and EPB. The IR spectra could directly reflect the integrated chemical compositions of complicated mixtures, and it may be available for use in further chromatographic analysis.

Primary Research of HPLC Fingerprints on Distinguishing Authentic Propolis From the Fake One

HPLC Fingerprints in Distinguishing Propolis and Poplar Tree Gum

HPLC fingerprint graphs identification of different geographical origin of propolis and its authenticity

HPLC fingerprint of propolis

Development of high-performance liquid chromatographic for quality and authenticity control of Chinese propolis.

[HPLC Fingerprint of the Tablets of Ginkgo Biloba L].

HPLC Fingerprint of Dendrobium officinale

Study and Application of Fingerprints of Ginkgo Biloba Leaves Preparations

Identification of Propolis and Poplar Tree Gum: A Review

Development and Validation of HPLC Method for Determination of Salicin in Poplar Buds: Application for Screening of Counterfeit Propolis

Determination of Caffeic Acid and Eight Flavones in Propolis by HPLC

Identification of Free Radical Scavengers from Brazilian Green Propolis Using Off-Line HPLC-DPPH Assay and LC-MS.

Identification of Catechol As a New Marker for Detecting Propolis Adulteration.

A Survey of the Incidence of Poplar Tree Gum in Propolis Products on the Chinese Retail Market

Simultaneous Quantification of Eight Major Bioactive Phenolic Compounds in Chinese Propolis by High-Performance Liquid Chromatography

Advances in the Analysis of Flavonoids Compounds in Propolis

Rapid Discrimination of Extracts of Chinese Propolis and Poplar Buds by FT-IR and 2D IR Correlation Spectroscopy

Simultaneous determination of 20 phenolic compounds in propolis by HPLC-UV and HPLC-MS/MS

High-Performance Liquid Chromatography Fingerprint Analysis of Smilacis Glabrae Rhizoma and Its Adulterants

Grouping, Spectrum–Effect Relationship and Antioxidant Compounds of Chinese Propolis from Different Regions Using Multivariate Analyses and Off-Line Anti-DPPH Assay

Recent Advances on HPLC-MS in Quality Control of Propolis