Physiological and biochemical characteristics of pig versus bamboo biochars and their effects on ammonia volatilization in greenhouse vegetable production

Kouping LU,Xi GUO,Guotao HU,Xing YANG,Xiaoli XU,Hailong WANG
DOI: https://doi.org/10.11833/j.issn.2095-0756.2017.04.010
2017-01-01
Abstract:To evaluate the effect of feedstock materials on characteristics of biochar products from a pig-derived biochar ( PB) and a bamboo-derived biochar (BB), biochar properties were evaluated and compared in a laboratory study. A field experiment was also carried out to evaluate the effect of PB and BB on soil ammonia volatilization in an Ipomoea aquatica -Brassica chinensis rotation system in a greenhouse at Banqiao Town, Lin'an City, Zhejiang Province, China. Treatments included (1) a control (no biochar); (2) one application of 20 t·hm-2 PB (20-0-PB) prior to the first I. aquatica crop; (3) one application of 20 t·hm-2 of BB (20-0-BB) prior to the first I. aquatica crop; (4) two applications of PB with 10 t·hm-2 being applied prior to the I. aquat-ica season and the remaining PB being applied prior to the B. chinensis season at an application rate of 10 t· hm-2 (10-10-PB); and (5) two applications of BB with 10 t·hm-2 being applied prior to the I. aquatica season and the remaining BB being applied prior to the B. chinensis season at an application rate of 10 t·hm-2 (10-10-BB). Results showed that PB had higher contents of phosphorus and ash as well as a lower content of car-bon than those of BB; whereas, BB had a higher carbon content and a lower ash content than those of PB. The ammonia volatilization rate had a highly significant correlation (P<0.01) with soil temperature, and the am-monia volatilization losses in the Ipomoea aquatica crop season were higher than in the Brassica chinensis crop season. The PB and BB treatments significantly (P<0.05) reduced ammonia volatilization losses in the I. aquatica crop season, but had no significant effect in the B. chinensis crop season. Compared with the 10-10-PB or 10-10-BB treatments, ammonia volatilization losses were significantly (P<0.05) reduced with 20-0-PB (28.7%) and 20-0-BB (13.3%) treatments in the first I. aquatica crop season, and the PB treatment was more effective than the BB treatment. No significant differences between PB and BB treatments in the second I. aquatica crop season were found. Compared with the control, the 20-0-PB treatment reduced ammonia volatilization losses 41%over the whole rotation. In conclusion, pig biochar treatments appeared to be more ef-fective than bamboo biochar treatments in reducing ammonia volatilization losses from the soil. [ Ch, 3 fig. 4 tab. 29 ref.]
What problem does this paper attempt to address?