Effects of nitrogen management on grain yield and nitrogen use efficiency of two hybrid rice varieties with different panicle masses

Shimin Yang,Zhiyuan Yang,Yongjian Sun,Jun Ma
DOI: https://doi.org/10.3785/j.issn.1008-9209.2015.07.241
2015-01-01
Abstract:Summary In Sichuan Basin with low solar radiation , the grain yield of hybrid rice was restricted by the high humidity and small diurnal temperature . The breeding and application of large panicle hybrid varieties solved the problem to a certain extent . However , the high‐yielding performance of large panicle hybrid rice was not stable . In order to explore the measures of maintaining the high‐yielding performance of large panicle hybrid rice , it is necessary to investigate the characters of its grain yield formation . Two hybrid varieties with different panicle masses (Chuannongyou 498 , about 5 g per panicle;Chuanyou 6203 , about 4 g per panicle) were studied on the differences of dry matter accumulation and yield components , and five different nitrogen ( N) managements ( the N application proportion of base‐tillering and panicle fertilizers was 90∶10 , 75∶ 25 , 60∶ 40 , 45∶ 55 , 30∶ 70 , respectively) integrated with 15 N tracing were applied to investigate the traits of N uptake across the whole growth stage . The results showed that there was no significant difference in spikelet per panicle between large and medium panicle hybrid rice . Medium panicle hybrid rice showed significant advantages in effective panicles and total spikelet compared to large panicle hybrid rice;however , the thousand‐grain mass of large panicle hybrid rice was larger , and this superiority played a major role in gaining higher grain yield than medium panicle hybrid rice . There was no significant difference in dry matter accumulation at maturity stage between large and medium panicle hybrid rice , but difference of dry matter productivity was observed before and after anthesis . Compared to medium panicle hybrid rice , large panicle hybrid rice accumulated more dry matters before anthesis , and larger percentage of which was exported to the panicle at anthesis , contributing approximately 40% of its grain yield . For medium panicle hybrid rice , dry matter exportation only contributed about 25% of its grain yield . For N management treatments , 40% and 25% were the optimal panicle N ratios which could gain the highest grain yields for large and medium panicle hybrid rice respectively . According to the relation formula between panicle N ratio and grain yield , 33% was the optimal panicle N ratio which produced the most grains for large panicle hybrid rice , while the optimal panicle N ratio for medium panicle hybrid rice was 27% . The difference for the optimal panicle N ratio between large and medium panicle hybrid rice was caused by varied demands on N at different growth stages . There was no significant difference for N uptake of basal fertilizer between large and medium panicle hybrid rice . Medium panicle hybrid rice showed significant merits in assimilating N at tillering stage than large panicle hybrid rice . In contrast , large panicle hybrid rice assimilated more N at booting stage . A further increase of panicle N based on the optimal panicle N ratio could increase N recovery efficiency , but N physiological efficiency would drop rapidly and the yield‐increasing effects of N fertilizer became poor . In conclusion , 33% and 27% are the optimal panicle N ratios for large and medium panicle hybrid rice , respectively , which increase the grain yield and N utilization efficiency simultaneously .
What problem does this paper attempt to address?