Principal Component Analysis and Grey Correlation Analysis for Low Phosphorus Tolerance Evaluation in Masson Pine (Pinus massoniana)of Different Provenances

Bo-wen CUI,Guang QIAO,Fu-hua FAN,Gui-jie DING,Xiao-peng WEN
DOI: https://doi.org/10.13718/j.cnki.xdzk.2017.08.007
2017-01-01
Abstract:The morphological and physiological parameters of masson pine (Pinus massoniana) seedlings from different provenances under phosphorus stress were studied through principal component and grey correlation analyses to select germplasms with high tolerance to low phosphorus stress.Seedlings of seven masson pine provenances from Tongmian of Guangxi (GT),Longyan and Wuping of Fujian (FL and FW),Chongyi of Jiangxi (JC),Rucheng of Hunan (HR),Meishan of Sichuan (SM) and Mengguan of Guizhou (GM) were used as materials for a pot experiment with different phosphorus concentrations,i. e. normal phosphorus (KH2PO410 mg/L,control) and low phosphorus (KH2PO42.0 mg/L).Plant height, taproot length,root weight,fresh weight of the shoot,ratio of root to shoot,total chlorophyll content, carotenoids content,soluble sugars,MDA,soluble protein content,SOD activity,POD activity,CAT ac-tivity and root activity were determined.The low phosphorus tolerance coefficients of the above 15 mor-phological and physiological parameters were used as the indexes of tolerance to low phosphorus stress of the seedlings,and principal component analysis and grey correlation analysis were made to give a compre-hensive evaluation.The principal component analysis classified the 15 single parameters into 4 independent comprehensive components.Based on the computation with the membership function method,SM had the maximum D value of tolerance to low phosphorus stress.Grey correlation analysis indicated that carotenoid content,root activity,MDA and free proline content were closely related to low phosphorus tolerance in masson pine.In conclusion,principal component analysis and grey correlation analysis could be effectively used for germplasm selection for high tolerance to low phosphorus stress in masson pine;of the 7 prove-nances studied SM had the highest tolerance to low phosphorus stress,followed by FL and FW,and GT and HR showed the lowest tolerance.
What problem does this paper attempt to address?