Effect of Different Straw Returning Ways on Soil Physical and Chemical Properties

张久明,迟凤琴,匡恩俊,韩锦泽,刘宝林
DOI: https://doi.org/10.11942/j.issn1002-2767.2016.09.0030
2016-01-01
Abstract:In the northeast China ,maizeacreage has increased year by year ,as an important organic material of maizistraw ,itreturnes difficulty ,in order to explore the best returning way and returning amount to suit black , the effects of straw returningonsoil structure and fertility were researched .The results showed that maizi straw mixed to topsoil ,1/2 and 1/3 returning reduced the soil bulk density than other treatments ,increased the soil total porosity and field water holding capacity significantly ,comparingwith contrast was significant difference ;Between straw full amount returning and straw full amount returning added the decomposing agent ,there was not significant difference .Straw 1/2 and 1/3 returning compared to contrast increasedmore than 2 .000 mm fraction aggregate ,the best returning way of soil organic material improved large aggregate (>0 .250 mm) and the formation of good soil structure .Each treatment of straw returning could increase soil available nutrient and adjust soil pH ,after straw returning ,a considerable investment of organic carbon source provided carbon and energy sources for the growth of the soil microbial ,microbial biomass carbon and microbial biomass nitrogen were increased in straw returning different treatment .1/2 and 1/3 returning in straw mixed to topsoil ,the maizi growth indexes and yield was better than other treatment ,showed that 1/2 and 1/3 returning in straw mixed to topsoil improved soil structure than other treatment ,improved the microbial activity and soil nutrient ,showed the advantage to increase crop yields .
What problem does this paper attempt to address?