Comparison of Effects on Partial Nitrification Between Anoxic-Oxic and Controling DO/HRT Process

ZHANG Jie,ZHANG Yanhui,LI Dong,LIANG Yuhai,GUAN Hongwei,ZHAO Shixun

DOI: https://doi.org/10.11918/j.issn.0367-6234.2016.08.002

2016-01-01

Abstract:To compare the effect of two different operational modes on partial nitrification ( PN ), two?stage continuous stirred?tank reactors (CSTR) 1#(anoxic?oxic) and 2#(controlling DO and HRT) were constructed and operated at room temperature (18-22℃). Start?up time, stability, aeration consumption, sludge settling ability, as well as the adaptability to the decreasing of ammonia nitrogen concentration were investigated. PN in 1#and 2#were accomplished in 26 d and 41 d, respectively. When the effluent of an anaerobic/oxic ( A/O) process for phosphorous removing (containing ammonia nitrogen 35-43 mg/L) was used as influent, PN was stable both under 1# and 2#condition, however, aeration consumption could be reduced by about 20% in 2#. When the ammonia nitrogen decreasing from 43 to 27 mg/L, PN in 1# would be unstable and the rates of PN decreased to 67.39%. For comparison, PN in 2#could be maintained stable with an ammonia removal rate of >88%. Settleability of sludge was good both in 1#and 2#. Rapid start?up could be achieved through controlling DO and HRT, and a stable and efficient PN could be maintained through anoxic?oxic.