Abstract:The main contributions of this paper are as follows: (1) Some studies use a part of the roadside units (RSUs) in the RSU plane as the underlying controllers to assist network management in reducing the vehicle communication delay in the edge network. Given the lack of in‐depth research on how the RSU plane works, the roles and tasks of the domain controller and the RSU controllers in processing the flow rule request sent by the on board units (OBUs) are clearly explained, and the flow setup delay is also clearly defined. (2) Formulate an optimization objective model of the RSU plane in software‐defined vehicular networks. Based on the high mobility of the vehicle network, the increase of flow setup delay caused by RSU node remapping is reduced by reducing the state fluctuation of the RSU plane. (3) By adding a traffic flow trajectory prediction module for the domain controller, issue the flow rules in advance to the underlying RSU controller covering the arrival position of the vehicle, to further reduce the flow setup delay.As a new research field, software‐defined vehicular networks (SDVN) provide a novel idea for the network management of the internet of vehicles. Due to the time‐sensitivity of vehicle edge networks, time delay optimization for flow rule management is of great significance to improve system performance. Some existing SDVN architectures select part of the underlying roadside units (RSUs) as underlying controllers to assist the upper control plane. There is no mention of how to optimize the state switching between the RSU controller and the common RSU, which may increase the delay and communication overhead. This paper proposes an RSU plane optimization scheme to reduce the state fluctuation between RSUs with control functions. Firstly, we propose a state fluctuation optimization model of the RSU plane. Secondly, the division method and dynamic adjustment strategy of the RSU plane are designed. Finally, a position prediction method is utilized to realize the pre‐installation of flow rules. We use two common methods (greedy and dynamic schemes) to compare with the minimum state fluctuation approach. The simulation analyzes the performance using four parameters. Under the same conditions, the proposed scheme can reduce the flow setup delay and end‐to‐end delay, while reducing the number of controllers and overhead.

Fair traffic scheduling algorithm for the roadside unit

Fair downlink traffic scheduling for energy sustainable vehicular roadside infrastructure

Fair Packet Scheduling Algorithm for Adaptive Wireless Communication System

Be Stable and Fair: Robust Data Scheduling for Vehicular Networks

Downlink Traffic Scheduling with Contact Durations Awareness for Vehicular Infrastructures

Performance Analysis of RSU-to-vehicle System in Vehicular Delay Tolerant Networks

An Adaptive Packet-Size Adjusting Scheme for Improving Fairness in Vehicle Networks

Simple Fair Scheduling Algorithm for Wireless Networks

Roadside Units Placement for Traffic Flows Coverage Requirement in Vehicular Networks

A Novel Scheduling Scheme for Multiple Traffic Classes

Roadside units plane optimization scheme in software‐defined vehicular networks

A Task Scheduling Optimization Method for Vehicles Serving as Obstacles in Mobile Edge Computing Based IoV Systems

A Distributed Scheduling Algorithm for End-to-End Flow Fairness in Wireless Multi-hop Networks

A Scheduling Algorithm for Improving Fairness between Uplink TCP Flows

Multi-Agent Reinforcement Learning-Based Fairness-Aware Scheduling for Bursty Traffic.

Fairness-Aware Dynamic Rate Control and Flow Scheduling for Network Utility Maximization in Network Service Chain.

Minimum Reserved Traffic Rate Based Fair Scheduling Algorithm in IEEE 802.16e

On Scheduling of Data Dissemination in Vehicular Networks with Mesh Backhaul

Mobile-service based Max-Min Fairness Resource Scheduling for Heterogeneous Vehicular Networks

Enhanced Max-C/I Scheduling Algorithm with Real-Time Fairness Monitoring

Fair Scheduling in Networks Through Packet Election