Abstract:Concurrent Subspace Optimization (CSSO) is one of the main decomposition approaches in Multidisciplinary Design Optimization (MDO). It supports a collaborative and distributed multidisciplinary design optimization environment among different disciplinary groups. Sobieski first proposed the subspace optimization method (Sobieszczanski-Sobieski, 1988), and Sobieski’s blueprint was further developed by Bloebaum and subsequently named the concurrent subspace optimization method (Bolebaum, 1991). Renaud developed a secondorder variant of the Global Sensitivity Equation (GSE) method and an alternative potential coordination procedure for the CSSO method (Renaud & Gabriele, 1993a, 1993b, 1994). Sellar proposed to replace GSE with the neutral-network based response surface method (Sellar et al., 1996). The CSSO method allows a complex couple system to be decomposed into smaller, temporarily decoupled subsystems, each corresponding to different disciplines (subspaces). Each subspace optimization minimizes the system objective function subject to its own constraints as well as constraints contributed from the other subspaces. Each subspace optimization use its own high-fidelity analysis tools as well as given surrogate models or low-fidelity analysis tool provided by the other subspaces for analysis. Subsequently, the subspace optimizations can be performed concurrently. The system-level coordination optimization will be implemented completely based on approximation analysis tools. The subspace optimizations and the coordination optimization will be alternatively performed until results are finally decided by the coordination optimization. Therefore, the CSSO method is particularly suited to applications in a design organization where tasks are distributed among different design groups. The CSSO method was developed initially for a single objective MDO problem. However, most MDO problems are essentially multi-objective. In recent years more work (Aute & Azarm, 2006; Huang & Bloebaum, 2004; McAllister et al., 2000; McAllister et al., 2004; Orr & Hajela, 2005; Parashar & Bloebaum, 2006; Tappeta & Renaud, 1997; Zhang et al., 2008) has focused on extending existing MDO method to handle such multi-objective MDO problems, by means of integrating a multi-objective optimization method within the MDO framework. This kind of method can be called a multi-objective MDO method. It is an effective way to integrate multi-objective optimization method within the CSSO framework to develop the multi-objective MDO method. CSSO was extended to solve multiobjective MDO problems, including the Multi-objective Pareto CSSO (MOPCSSO) method,

Concurrent Subspace Multidisciplinary Design Optimization for Turbine Blade

Kriging Model-Based Multidisciplinary Design Optimization for Turbine Blade

Multi-disciplinary Feasible Decoupling in Multidisciplinary Design Optimization for Turbine Blade

Reliability and Multidisciplinary Design Optimization for Turbine Blade Based on Single-Loop Method

Multidisciplinary Design Optimization of Cooling Turbine Blade Profiles Based on Surrogate Model

Multidisciplinary Design Optimization on Conceptual Design of Aero-engine

Multidisciplinary Probabilistic and Robust Design Optimization for Turbine Blade

Parametric Modeling and Multidisciplinary Design Optimization for Cooling Turbine Blade

Three-Dimensional Aerodynamic Design Optimization of A Turbine Blade by Using an Adjoint Method

Reliability-based Multidisciplinary Design Optimization for Turbine Blade Using Double Loop Approach

Multidisciplinary Design Optimization Based on Parameterized Free-Form Deformation for Single Turbine

Multidisciplinary Design and Multi-Objective Optimization on Guide Fins of Twin-Web Disk Using Kriging Surrogate Model

Multi-disciplinary aero-dynamic-thermal-structure design optimization for turbine blade

Application of Fluid-solid Coupling on Multidisciplinary Optimization Design for Turbine Blades

Multi-Objective Design Optimization of Cooling Turbine Blade Based on Kriging Model

Free-Form Deformation Application in Multidisciplinary Design Optimization Procedure of Turbine Blades

Multidisciplinary design optimization of a cooling vane

Concurrent Subspace Optimization for Aircraft System Design

EFFICIENT METHOD FOR MULTIDISCIPLINARY DESIGN OPTIMIZATION BY CONSIDERING UNCERTAINTY

A Fluid–structure Analysis Approach and Its Application in the Uncertainty-Based Multidisciplinary Design and Optimization for Blades

Collaborative Optimization Based on KS Function and Its Application