Abstract:Causal pluralism proposes that humans can reason about causes and effects in terms of both dependency and process relations, depending on the scenario. Support for this view is provided by responses to double prevention scenarios in which an affector attempts to bring about an outcome, a preventer attempts to prevent the outcome, and a double preventer intervenes to stop the preventer's prevention attempt. Previous research indicates that reasoners award the affector high causal ratings regardless of whether their action was executed intentionally, whereas reasoners only award the double preventer high causal ratings when the double preventer acts intentionally. These results were interpreted as evidence that intentional actions prompt reasoners to differentially weight separately maintained representations of dependency and process relations. The current study presents three challenges to this causal pluralism account by (1) questioning whether intentionality only affects causal ratings by increasing the weighting placed on dependency relations during reasoning (Experiments 1-2), (2) presenting evidence consistent with the possibility that reasoners interpret the double preventer's action in terms of a process relation (Experiments 1-2), and (3) demonstrating that an unintentional double preventer can receive significantly higher causal ratings than an intentional affector when the order in which the characters act is altered (Experiments 3-4). These results underscore the need to revisit fundamental questions regarding how reasoners form, maintain, and reason over representations of causal scenarios featuring intentional actions.

Cyclic Causality in Reasoning about Action

When Do Program-of-Thought Works for Reasoning?

Learning a Structural Causal Model for Intuition Reasoning in Conversation

Precondition and Effect Reasoning for Action Recognition

Reasoning about Unreliable Actions

ROCK: Causal Inference Principles for Reasoning about Commonsense Causality

On the Complexity of Counterfactual Reasoning

A Logical Approach to Doxastic Causal Reasoning.

Counterfactual Collaborative Reasoning

Inferring Hidden Statuses and Actions in Video by Causal Reasoning

On Counterfactual Reasoning

Causal Interventions on Causal Paths: Mapping GPT-2's Reasoning From Syntax to Semantics

ActionReasoningBench: Reasoning about Actions with and without Ramification Constraints

From Checking to Inference: Actual Causality Computations as Optimization Problems

Causal Reasoning from Meta-reinforcement Learning

Revisiting causal pluralism: Intention, process, and dependency in cases of double prevention

Causal Induction from Visual Observations for Goal Directed Tasks

Nondeterministic Causal Models

Action, Game of Governance and Reasoning

Actional-Perceptual Causality: Concepts and Inductive Learning for AI and Robotics