Abstract:Programming courses can be challenging for first year university students, especially for those without prior coding experience. Students initially struggle with code syntax, but as more advanced topics are introduced across a semester, the difficulty in learning to program shifts to learning computational thinking (e.g., debugging strategies). This study examined the relationships between students' rate of programming errors and their grades on two exams. Using an online integrated development environment, data were collected from 280 students in a Java programming course. The course had two parts. The first focused on introductory procedural programming and culminated with exam 1, while the second part covered more complex topics and object-oriented programming and ended with exam 2. To measure students' programming abilities, 51095 code snapshots were collected from students while they completed assignments that were autograded based on unit tests. Compiler and runtime errors were extracted from the snapshots, and three measures -- Error Count, Error Quotient and Repeated Error Density -- were explored to identify the best measure explaining variability in exam grades. Models utilizing Error Quotient outperformed the models using the other two measures, in terms of the explained variability in grades and Bayesian Information Criterion. Compiler errors were significant predictors of exam 1 grades but not exam 2 grades; only runtime errors significantly predicted exam 2 grades. The findings indicate that leveraging Error Quotient with multiple error types (compiler and runtime) may be a better measure of students' introductory programming abilities, though still not explaining most of the observed variability.

Grade C++ code judge with constructing abstract syntax tree model

A Differential Testing Approach for Evaluating Abstract Syntax Tree Mapping Algorithms

Comparing semantic graph representations of source code: The case of automatic feedback on programming assignments

Code Generation Based Grading: Evaluating an Auto-grading Mechanism for "Explain-in-Plain-English" Questions

Programming Online Judge System

SimGrade: Using Code Similarity Measures for More Accurate Human Grading

Automatic Grading and Feedback using Program Repair for Introductory Programming Courses

A Computer Aided Grading System for Subjective Tests

Grading Programs Based on Hybrid Analysis.

Design of Exercise Grading System Based on Text Similarity Computing

Automated Evaluation for Performance Test Scripts

Comparison of Three Programming Error Measures for Explaining Variability in CS1 Grades

Software Verification and Graph Similarity for Automated Evaluation of Students' Assignments

CodeJudge-Eval: Can Large Language Models be Good Judges in Code Understanding?

Graph semantic similarity-based automatic assessment for programming exercises

An Automated Grader for Chinese Essay Combining Shallow and Deep Semantic Attributes

Validity of a graph-based automatic assessment system for programming assignments: human versus automatic grading

Research on C/C++ Code Static Detection Based on Syntax Tree

Revisiting Code Similarity Evaluation with Abstract Syntax Tree Edit Distance

Program Equivalence for Assisted Grading of Functional Programs (Extended Version)

A Method of Computer Automatic Scoring for Subjective Questions