Abstract:This paper compares tracking performances of the inverse hysteresis model-based feedforward compensator and the feedback-feedforward combined controller for the time-varying hysteresis nonlinearity of a piezoelectric-stack-actuator-driven (PSA-driven) system. Three different inverse hysteresis models, including Bouc-Wen, polynomial, and Prandtl-Ishlinskii (PI), are adopted to design feedforward compensator for the PSA-driven compliant system. Particle swarm optimization (PSO) scheme is employed to estimate model parameters of the Bouc-Wen and PI hysteresis models, respectively, whereas the least-mean-square-error based criterion is utilized in identifying the polynomial-based hysteresis model. Although solely feedforward compensation approach seems workable for systems with rate-independent hysteresis or slow tracking trajectories, large modeling errors are inevitable when fast trajectory or rate-dependent hysteresis is facing. To improve tracking performances, conventional PID control is augmented to the feedforward controllers. The resultant scheme is denoted as the feedback-feedforward combined control. To compare control performances of the solely feedforward and feedback-feedforward combined scheme, a number of experiments focusing on sinusoidal trajectories with different frequency have been implemented on the PSA-driven stage system. The results indicate that significant performance improvement can be achieved provided PID control is augmented to the solely feedforward approach. When different hysteresis models are of concerned, PI hysteresis model performs better in either feedforward or combined cases.

Neural Network Modeling and Linear Compensation Control for Hysteresis of PZT

Modeling of Nonlinear Responses for Reciprocal Transducers Involving Polarization Switching

Precision control of piezoelectric actuator using support vector regression nonlinear model and neural networks

Modeling and Compensation for Dynamic Hysteresis of Piezoelectric Actuators Based on Lissajous Curve

Research on Nonlinear Model of Piezoelectric Actuator

Research on hysteresis of piezoelectric actuator

Tracking Control of Piezoceramic Actuators by Using Preisach Model

Hysteresis Effect Suppression: Replacing Modeling with Linear and Nonlinear Methods Combination

Modeling and Single Neuron Adaptive Pid Control of Flexible Piezoelectric Cantilever Beam

Hysteresis Compensation of a Piezoelectric-Stack-actuator-driven (Psa-Driven) System Using Inversion-Based Models and Feedback Control

Modeling and Simo Controlling of Piezoceramic Hysteresis

Rate-dependent Dynamic Modeling and Tracking Control for Piezoelectric Hysteresis Nonlinear Systems

Neural Networks Based Modeling and Robust Control of Hysteresis

Modeling and Control of Piezoelectric Hysteresis: A Polynomial-Based Fractional Order Disturbance Compensation Approach

A review of nonlinear hysteresis modeling and control of piezoelectric actuators

£ 1 Adaptive Control Design for Hysteresis Compensation within Piezoelectric Actuators

Modeling and identification of nonlinear hysteresis behaviour of piezoelectric actuators using a computationally efficient phenomenological model and modified cuckoo search algorithm

Model-Based Control for Piezoelectric-Actuated Systems Using Inverse Prandtl-Ishlinskii Model and Particle Swarm Optimization

Model-Free Adaptive Nonlinearity and Hysteresis Compensation Control Strategy with Application to Nano-Precision Piezoelectric Stage

Neural Network Self-Tuning Control for a Piezoelectric Actuator

Nonlinear Hysteresis Modeling of Piezoelectric Actuators Using a Generalized Bouc–Wen Model