Comparison Study of Electronic Nose Pattern Recognition Algorithms

ZHANG Qin-yi,XIE Chang-sheng,YANG Hao,WANG Lin,ZHANG Shun-ping
DOI: https://doi.org/10.3969/j.issn.1004-1699.2005.03.034
2005-01-01
Abstract:K-nearest neighbor(k-NN),linear discriminant analysis(LDA),back-propagation artificial neural networks(BP-ANN),probabilistic neural networks(PNN),learning vector quantization(LVQ) and self-organizing map(SOM) pattern recognition algorithms are compared for their ability to classify electronic nose data.Comparisons are made based on four qualitative criteria (calculating speed,training speed,memory requirements and robustness) and one quantitative criterion(classification accuracy).It is shown that the neural network based algorithms have higher classification accuracies than the statistical theory based algorithms.When considering the qualitative criteria,LVQ is suggested for applications where training speed is not required.PNN is recommended for applications where memory requirement is not critical.When high selective signals are applied,LDA should be the fittest algorithm because of its high classification accuracy,high speed and low memory requirements.
What problem does this paper attempt to address?