Effects of Different Freezing and Thawing Processes on Chicken Quality

Bing YU,Jingxin SUN,Linhong YU,Gongming LIU,Ming HUANG,Xinglian XU
DOI: https://doi.org/10.7506/rlyj1001-8123-201501002
2015-01-01
Meat Research
Abstract:The objective of this work was to elucidate the effects of two different freezing methods, ordinary freezing at?18℃(freezing 1) and liquid-nitrogen quick freezing (freezing 2), and two different thawing methods, natural thawing at 4℃(thawing 1) and thawing at fluctuating low temperatures (2℃ first and then 6℃ and 2℃ again) and a high humidity higher than 90%(thawing 2), on chicken quality. Four freezing-thawing treatments including 1+1, 1+2, 2+1, and 2+2 were designed. Chicken samples from four treatment groups were measured for water retention properties (juice loss, dripping loss, high-pressure water loss, and cooking loss) and tenderness and subjected to protein analysis by sodium dodecyl sulphate-polyacrylamide gel electrophoresis (SDS-PAGE). The results showed that the weight loss of quick frozen chicken was reduced by 1.07%compared with that of ordinary frozen sample. The best water retention properties were obtained by using freezing 2+thawing 2, and the resulting thawing loss, dripping loss, high-pressure loss and cooking loss were 0.22%, 0.54%, 44.53%, and 11.93%(P<0.05), respectively. Degradation of sarcoplasmic proteins was observed to different degrees in all treatment groups, which was minimized by freezing 2+thawing 2. Moreover, this treatment was the most effective for reducing deterioration of chicken quality, increasing water holding properties and decreasing weight loss during freezing and thawing.
What problem does this paper attempt to address?