INFLUENCE ON P USE EFFICIENCY BY APPLICATION OF ANNUAL P AS BASAL FERTILIZER IN MAIZE SEASON UNDER MAIZE-RICE ROTATION

Guo-ying YUAN,Yu-ling HAN,Wen CHEN,Xue-dong FANG,Dan WANG,Ping LI,Ming ZHAN,Ming ZHAO
DOI: https://doi.org/10.11870/cjlyzyyhj201712023
2017-01-01
Abstract:The " spring-maize & late-rice" rotation is a new planting type in southern China recently.The phosphorus (P) fertilizer allocation in the two season crops (maize and rice) is important for understanding how P fertilizer efficiencies affect on crops yields.An annual maize-rice field experiment was conducted in Wuxue County,Hubei province between March and October 2015.According to the P fertilizer amount used in the two crops,seven treatments were applied in the experiment,which includes no P application in both crop seasons (P0),conventional P application in both crop seasons(P1),1/3 P for late rice was forward applied as basal fertilizer in maize season(P2),2/3 P for late rice was forward applied as basal fertilizer in maize season(P3),all P for late rice was forward applied as basal fertilizer in maize season (P4),all P for late rice was forwarded and the total annual P was decreased by 15% (P5) and all P for late rice was forwarded and the total annual P was decreased by 30% (P6),respectively.We analyzed the crop yields,phosphorus uptake and phosphorus use efficiency in different treatments.Compared with the conventional P application(P1),the P3 and P4 treatments significantly increased the rice yield and the allocation of rive dry matter,maize,and rice yields increased by 4.87% and 6.74% respectively.There was no significant difference in rice yields between P5 and P1,but the yield of late rice was significantly decreased when the annual total P application decreased by 30% (P6).The forward application in maize season of P fertilizer for the late rice season significantly promoted the uptake of P by maize and late rice,and significantly reduced the apparent surplus of soil P.The soil phosphate-dependent rate of two crops decreased significantly under P2,P3,and P4 treatments,in comparison with P1 treatment,by 11.63%,26.47%,and 22.08%,respectively.From the perspective of P use efficiency,the P fertilizer cumulative recovery efficiency,agronomic efficiency,partial factor productivity and fertilization contribution rate of P4 treatment were significantly higher than those of P1,which was increased by 102.46%,194.83%,6.73% and 176.16%.Compared with P1 treatment,the treatment of P5 had no significant effect on the annual P fertilizer contribution rate and agronomic efficiency but increased the P recovery efficiency and partial factor productivity by 32.56% and 58.05%.The study proved that P application in maize season had significant residual effects in late rice season,and it had higher P use efficiency than that the P application in the rice season.All P fertilizer for late rice could be moved to maize season,and even the total P application amount was reduced 15%.
What problem does this paper attempt to address?