Interaction betweenEichhornia crassipe and Phytoplankton under Large Water Surface Controlled Growth ofEichhornia crassipe

XU Cunfa,LIU Haiqin,XU Weimin,QIN Hongjie,WEN Xuezheng,ZHANG Yingying,ZHANG Zhiyong
DOI: https://doi.org/10.16258/j.cnki.1674-5906.2016.05.018
2016-01-01
Abstract:In order to discuss the interaction between phytoplankton andEichhornia crassipeunder large water surface controlled condition, phytoplankton were indentified and counted, and the physiological changes ofE. crassipe were investigated in cyanoabacterial governance zone, an enclosed area (0.25 km2), nearby north shore of Wai hai, Dianchi Lake. 9.30 kg·m-2 E. crassipe seedlings were planted with covering area of 2.51 hm2 at the end of June and harvested at the end of December. Results showed that 46 species of phytoplankton belonging to 7 genera were identified in the water area; the confined growth ofE. crassipehad no significant effects on the structure of the phytoplankton. The biomass of phytoplankton was higher in the region withE. crassipe than the area withoutE. crassipe, and the maximum biomass of phytoplankton in the region withE. crassipe was 1.76×109 cells·L-1, which was 2.2 times higher than the area withoutE. crassipe.Cyanobacteral biomass was more than 88.0% of the total phytoplankton biomass, andMicrocystiswas shown as the dominant species in the water area. The maximum biomass ofMicrocystis in the region withE. crassipe was 1.75×109 cells·L-1, which was 2.4 times higher than the area withoutE. crassipe. Considerable Microcystis were absorbed byE.crassipe root-mats, which the maximum biomass ofMicrocystis was 1.67×109 cells·L-1. Phytoplankton absorbed on theE.crassipe root-mats had no effects on changes of stem height, root length andE. crassipe biomass, and on the root activity and leaf physiological change were not affected by phytoplankton. The average root surface area and root active surface area were 0.62 and 0.28 mg2·g-1, respectively. The average leaf soluble sugar and soluble protein content were 2.81 and 0.15 mg·g-1, respectively. Results indicated thatE. crassipe could change spatial distribution of phytoplankton, strand them in special water area and prevent them from covering lake with the wind. Meanwhile,E. crassipecould grow normally under high concentration of phytoplankton condition.
What problem does this paper attempt to address?