Effect of Water Management on Soil Bacterial Abundance and Community in the Rice Paddy Field

HOU Haijun,ZHANG Wenzhao,SHENG Jianlin,WANG Cong,QIN Hongling

DOI: https://doi.org/10.16258/j.cnki.1674-5906.2016.09.002

2016-01-01

Abstract:A field plot experiment was conducted on studying the influence of water management on soil bacterial abundance and community in a rice paddy field during the late rice season in Changsha, Hunan Province. The study included four treatments, that were intermittent flooding without straw (IFS0), intermittent flooding with straw (IFS), continuous flooding without straw (CFS0) and continuous flooding with straw (CFS). The results showed that: the density of bacteria in IF soil was higher than that in CF soil at DNA level. The abundance of bacteria was 3.9×1010 copies·g-1 dry soil in IFS0, which was 2.18 times of that in CFS0. The abundance of bacteria was 6.1×1010copies·g-1 dry soil in IFS, which was 2.21 times of that in CFS. At RNA level, the bacteria was more abundant in IF soil than in CF soil. The abundance of bacteria in IFS0 was 2.1×108 copies·g-1 dry soil, which was 2.58 times of that in CFS0. The abundance of bacteria in IFS0 was 2.8×108 copies·g-1 dry soil, which was 1.13 times of that in CFS0. The bacterial structure differed between intermittent flooding (IFS0 and IFS) and continuous flooding (CFS0 and CFS) at both DNA and RNA levels. The diversity index in intermittent flooding (IFS0 and IFS) was similar to that in continuous flooding (CFS0 and CFS) at DNA level, however, the predominant species were different. At RNA level, the diversity index in intermittent flooding (IFS0) was higher than that in continuous flooding (CFS0), it was even more obvious when straw was added. The diversity index in IFS was 2.49, which was higher than that in CFS, which was 0.28. In general, water management dramatically affected bacterial abundance and community structure in paddy soils and intermittent flooding was a better strategy than continuous flooding for rice cultivation.