The Studied area selection and result comparison of river non-point source pollution in plain urban area

Meng Xiangwei,XU Xuegong
DOI: https://doi.org/10.3969/j.issn.1674-5906.2014.01.021
2014-01-01
Abstract:As the plain urban area doesn’t show much difference in topography conditions, the usage of traditional river basin concept applying in plain urban area is not convincing. Thus, it’s hard to make an identification of effective border of the land use that can impact the relevant river water quality. To solve this issue, this paper compares the final results based respectively on the traditional buffer zone and drainage area method. Using 11 rivers’ pollutants in Tianjin Costal region and RS image, this paper apply GIS to study the correlation between land use and water quality by analyzing land use buffer data along the river banks and selecting land use data in drainage area, trying to provide methods and theories support to analyze and manage the rivers’ pollutants in plain urban area. The preliminary results showed that (1)The drainage area method can better illustrate the relationship between water quality and urban land use by taking full consideration of urban specialties such as water pollutant occurrence, movement and the impact of different landscape on water quality. It’s more theoretically convincing and comprehensive compared with the buffer zone analysis.(2)The buffer zone analysis can explain the influence on water quality under the effect of surface runoff to a certain extent. The negative correlation between the distance of buffer zone and the joint significance level can be used to identify the key area. For example, the joint significance level for arable land within 100 meters buffer zone is 0.848 and that number decreases to 0.165 as buffer zone expands to 300 meters. (3) Both methods show the same pattern for the relationship between water pollutant and land type. Urban construction land use will increase the water pollutant such as Pb and Hg;the arable land can reduce the heavy metal pollutant but will increase the organic pollutants such as ammonia as the area of arable land gets bigger;the grass land and water body will serve as the cleaner of the pollutants and help to improve the water quality. The combination of these two methods can help to get the result more objectively and comprehensively.
What problem does this paper attempt to address?