Comparison of Domestic and Foreign PM2.5 Source Profiles and Influence on Air Quality Simulation

Zequn XIA,Xiaoli FAN,Zhijiong HUANG,Yucong LIU,Xiaohong YIN,Xiao YE,Junyu ZHENG
DOI: https://doi.org/10.13198/j.issn.1001-6929.2017.01.55
2017-01-01
Abstract:Fine particulate matter(PM2.5)chemically-speciated source profiles of stationary combustion sources,industrial process sources,on-road mobile source and fugitive dust source derived from local studies and SPECIATE database were compared.We used the regional air quality model CMAQ to identify the influence of different source profiles on the simulation results.The results showed that:(1) PM2.5 chemical source profiles derived from local studies and SPECIATE database were different due to the discrepancy of the development level,emission standards,sampling and analysis method and dust removal equipment.(2)Sources with large differences were coal combustion power plants,cement manufacturing,heavy diesel vehicles and road dust,and chemical components with large differences were SO42-,NO3-and Ca.(3)Differences in on-road mobile source profiles affected the simulations the most (0.27 μg/m3 on average),followed by those in fugitive dust and industrial process.Differences in stationary combustion had smaller impact on the simulations(only 0.10 μg/m3 on average).The results showed that it is imperative to adopt uniform sampling and analysis methods in the development of source profiles in order to provide input data for source apportionment or model simulation.Considering the simulation impacts,developing local on-road mobile source profiles is a priority task.
What problem does this paper attempt to address?