Analysis of comprehensive environmental benefits in different municipal solid waste treatment scenarios based on dry-wet fraction separation through high-pressure extrusion pretreatment

Xin KONG,Jianguo LIU,Yili LIU,Ke ZHAO,Jin YUAN,Xiuping YUE
DOI: https://doi.org/10.13671/j.hjkxxb.2020.0213
2020-01-01
Abstract:Nowadays, garbage classification has become a ‘new fashion’ in China. However, at the present stage, the limited separation of wet waste ( represented by kitchen waste) and dry waste (represented by combustible waste) resulted in low performance of subsequent biological treatment, as well as low energy recovery rate of waste incineration plant. These problems have become the bottleneck limiting the continuous promotion of garbage classification in China. Based on the previous study of high⁃pressure extrusion pre⁃treatment, the present study further comparatively analysed three different scenarios of ‘wet waste anaerobic digestion ⁃dry waste incineration⁃digestate landfilling’, ‘wet waste anaerobic digestion⁃dry waste incineration⁃ digestate land⁃utilization’ and ‘ mixed waste incineration’ . Specifically, their respective comprehensive environmental benefits were evaluated from aspects of greenhouse gas emission, net energy generation, pollutants releasing, resource recovery and waste reduction using the method of life cycle 环 境 科 学 学 报 环 境 科 学 学 报 40卷 inventory analysis. This study further clarified the significance and effects of pre⁃treatment on municipal solid waste treatment in our country. The results showed that two scenarios using high⁃pressure extrusion could respectively reduce greenhouse gas emission by 218.84 and 264.08 kgCO2 ⁃Eq when dealing with one ton raw waste, which was far higher than that of scenario of raw waste incineration (169.68 kgCO2 ⁃Eq) . For the aspect of net energy generation amount, it was about 10% less in two dry⁃wet separation scenarios compared with the raw waste incineration scenario, however, fewer toxic pollutants were released in the former two scenarios as well. Furthermore, when one ton raw waste was disposed in scenario of ‘wet waste anaerobic digestion ⁃dry waste incineration⁃digestate land utilization’, it could not only recover about 160.7 kg fertilizer, but also achieve the entire reduction rate of 93.4%, which is a favourable scenario for waste situation in China.
What problem does this paper attempt to address?