Effects of urea on in-situ remediation of Cd polluted paddy soil and the structure and distribution of soil microbes under different water management

Rong HUANG,Yingming XU,Qingqing HUANG,Xu QIN,Lijie ZHAO,Xuefeng LIANG,Yiyun LIU
DOI: https://doi.org/10.7524/j.issn.0254-6108.2017072402
IF: 4.236
2018-01-01
Environmental Chemistry
Abstract:Pot experiments were conducted to investigate the effects of urea on in-situ remediation of Cd polluted paddy soil under different water management.The experimental results showed that with flooded and non-flooded water management,urea addition did not change the exchangeable Cd concentration by 0.025 mol·L-1 HCl significantly under the immobilization remediation of sepiolite,but it decreased the exchangeable Cd content by diethylenetriaminepentaacetic acid leaching significantly.Compared with the immobilization remediation of sepiolite,the Fe concentration of dithionite-citrate-bicarbonate leach liquor after urea addition was decreased by 39.61%-55.59% and 22.51%-53.63% under flooded and non-flooded management,respectively.Urea had a positive effect on soil Cd adsorption by root iron plaque under the flooded management,but have a negative effect under the non-flooded management.The Cd concentration of root was increased by 36.11%-71.30% and 58.20%-89.42% in the two water management,and the reduced glutathione concentration was decreased by 30.82%-41.97% and 13.47%-62.36%,respectively.The non-protein thiol concentration was decreased by 13.02%-29.54% after adding urea under flooded management,but had no significant change in non-flooded management.Under flooded management,adding low and medium dosage urea increased the Cd concentration in brown rice,but the concentration decreased after adding high dosage urea.The Cd concentration did not change significantly after adding different dosage urea under non-flooded water management.Unweighted pair-group method with arithmetic means and principal component analysis were used to analyze the soil microbial biomass.The results showed that immobilization remediation had no obvious influence on soil microbial structure and distribution under different experimental conditions.
What problem does this paper attempt to address?