Abstract:The concept of co-benefit, a negotiation topic in CO2 mitigation attracts worldwide attention including China in coping with climate change. Energy saving technologies as common measures for CO2 abatement, generally lead to co-benefits of local air pollution (LAP) because most LAP emissions are generated from combustion of carbonic fuels along with CO2. However, in the technological dimension, there are technologies that induce opposite effects on the co-benefit of CO2 and LAP in specific industry sectors. Precalcinating line and shaft kiln, two types of technologies adopted in clinker calcinating procedure in cement industry are examples: the former consume less energy but emit more dust and NOx than the later. As a result, the overall co-benefits of LAP reductions for cement industry are uncertain. This study consequently aims at assessing the overall co-benefit (although it may be a negative co-benefit) of CO2 mitigation policy on dust, NOx, SO2 emissions in China's cement industry aggregately by establishing bottom-up optimization model on the basis of all types of technologies which are called technology system in cement production. CO2 mitigation goal, as represented by reduction rate is regarded as constraint input into the model. In order to investigate the evolution of co-benefits and technology paths with the change of CO2 mitigation goal, hundreds of reduction rates are selected randomly between the range 0.5-10.5%. The lower bound 0.5% reveals CO2 emission reduction that can be reached for cement industry under existing political constraints and without any extra CO2 mitigation goal. The upper bound 10.5% is the greatest reduction rate under which the model could derive feasible solution. According to changes of technology penetration rates as CO2 goal tightens, we could evaluate the more cost-effective technologies from the perspective of co-benefit. They are vertical milling, precalcinating line with the scale of 7000-10,000 ton/day, roll-squeezer belonging to Main Production Technology (MPT), utilization of cement grinding aids, multi-channel coal burner belonging to Affiliated Energy-saving technology (AES), combination of bag-filter and electrostatic precipitator and ultra-low NOx burning technology belonging to Pollution Control Technology (PCT). With respect to the evolution of co-benefits on air pollutions, when the CO2 reduction rate is below 2.3%, co-benefit of dust and SO2 reduction exist while that of NOx does not; and when the rate is above 2.3%, co-benefits of all the three pollutants exist. A practically referable goal of CO2 mitigation rate of short/mid-term is approximately 5.5% in view of the following three considerations: a) co-benefits augment as CO2 reduction rate increases; b) total cost increases as the CO2 abatement goal becomes stricter; and c) the majority of emerging technologies normally cannot penetrate to 100% in cement production within a relatively short time. (C) 2015 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.

Discuss on Waste Reuse and CO2 Emission Mitigation in Cement Industry

Evaluating CO 2 emission performance in China’s cement industry: An enterprise perspective

Humble talk about low carbon dioxide emission technique for cement-concrete industry

Mitigation Of Climate Change By Reducing Carbon Dioxide Emissions In Cement Industry

Greening Cement in China: A Cost-Effective Roadmap

Utilization of solid wastes to sequestrate carbon dioxide in cement-based materials and methods to improve carbonation degree: A review

Historical trend and decarbonization pathway of China's cement industry: A literature review

Impacts of energy-saving and emission-reduction on sustainability of cement production

A review of low-carbon technologies and projects for the global cement industry

Goal and Technology Path of CO2 Mitigation in China's Cement Industry: from the Perspective of Co-Benefit

Challenges and opportunities to cement industry under the global warming-up background

The status and perspective of cement generation in coal fired power boilers

The Potential and Cost Analysis of Emission Reduction in China’s Cement Sector

Research on CO2 Emission Mitigation in Industrial Boilers

A Novel Process of CO2 Reduction Coupled with Municipal Solid Waste Gasification by Recycling Flue Gas During Co-Disposal in Cement Kilns

Life-cycle CO2 and Air Pollutant Emission Assessment of China’s Cement Industry under Planetary Boundaries

Full Life Cycle Emission Reduction Potential of Ultra-Low Emission Transformation in China's Cement Industry

Effectiveness of Novel and Traditional Methods to Incorporate Industrial Wastes in Cementitious Materials—an Overview

Quantifying the Impacts of Decarbonisation in China’s Cement Sector: A Perspective from an Integrated Assessment Approach

Global strategies and potentials to curb CO2 emissions in cement industry

The collaborative pollutants and carbon dioxide emission reduction and cost of ultra-low pollutant emission retrofit in China's cement kiln