Energy-saving Potential of a Pulse and Gliding (png) Driving Strategy for Battery Electric Vehicles

Kangkang ZHANG,Minggao OUYANG,Liangfei XU,Jianfeng HUA,Jianqiu LI,Xiaoyu ZHAO,Aiguo CHENG
DOI: https://doi.org/10.3969/j.issn.1674-8484.2014.02.012
2014-01-01
Abstract:The energy-saving potential was estimated by simulations and drum tests for Pulse and Gliding (PnG) driving strategies of battery electric vehicles. The relationships were investigated between several PnG strategy parameters including oscil ation distance, PnG cycle time, and average power consumption per unit driving distance. Idling loss models were established for the motor and the powertrain. The parameters were identiifed by drum tests. Three driving strategies, including the constant-speed driving strategy, the PnG strategy with clutch, and the PnG strategy without clutch, were simulated by energy lfow analysis, and then experimented by drum test. The results show that the PnG strategy without clutch has no energy-saving potentials while the PnG strategy with clutch can save 8.5%energy at the same average speed, compared with the constant-speed cruise strategy at the same velocity.
What problem does this paper attempt to address?