Experimental study of the effects of surface roughness on the vortex-induced vibration response of a riser

Yun GAO,Shi-xiao FU,You-ming XIONG,Li-ming LIU
DOI: https://doi.org/10.3969/j.issn.1007-7294.2015.h1.001
2015-01-01
Abstract:The effects of surface roughness on the vortex-induced vibration (VIV) of a riser were studied ex-perimentally. The drag, lift, tension, vortex-shedding frequency, vibration frequency, and displacement re-sponse of risers with different surface roughnesses are compared. The results indicate that a lock-in phe-nomenon occurs in the VIV in the in-line direction earlier than in the cross-flow direction, and thus the VIV response in the in-line direction is larger than in the cross-flow direction in the low-reduced-veloci-ty range. The tension in the riser has two peak frequencies. One peak is the dominant frequency, which co-incides with the dominant frequency of the drag and is induced by the VIV in the in-line direction. The other peak is at half of the dominant frequency, at the dominant frequency of the lift; it is caused by the VIV in the cross-flow direction. Hence, the responses in the cross-flow and in-line directions influence each other via the tension. It also observed that a rough riser has a smaller displacement response, a nar-rower lock-in region and a higher vortex shedding frequency, compared with a smooth riser. For rough ris-ers with different surface roughnesses, as the roughness of the riser increases, the onset of the lock-in re-gion occurs earlier, the lock-out point is delayed, and so the lock-in region becomes broader.
What problem does this paper attempt to address?