Analysis of misdiagnosis of amyotrophic lateral sclerosis pre-admission

Hui-fang WANG,Dong-sheng FAN,Jun ZHANG,Hua-guang ZHANG,Xiao-fei WANG,Ming LU,De-xuan KANG
DOI: https://doi.org/10.3969/j.issn.1672-6731.2005.04.010
2005-01-01
Chinese Journal of Contemporary Neurology and Neurosurgery
Abstract:Objective The pre-admission misdiagnosed patterns of 115 patients with amyotrophic lateral sclerosis (ALS) were retrospectively reviewed in order to strengthen the recognition of the clinical characteristics of this disease, minimize the misdiagnosis, and achieve the early diagnosis and treatment. Methods The clinical data of admitted patients diagnosed as motor neuron disease during January 2003 to March 2005 in The Third Hospital of Peking University were reviewed. All of the patients were strictly diagnosed according to the revised edition of the diagnostic criteria for ALS. A total of 115 patients with definitely diagnosed ALS and very possible ALS (including clinically and laboratory supported cases) were enrolled as study objects. Results There were 74 definite ALS cases and 41 very possible cases in all the 115 patients. Their mean diagnosis duration was 14.80 months, mean misdiagnosis duration was 6.40 months. Among these patients there were misdiagnosed 72 cases, not misdiagnosed 28 cases (15 of them were first diagnosed in this hospital, none was misdiagnosed). The total misdiagnosis rate was 72.00% (72/100) pre-admission. In definite and very possible ALS patients the misdiagnosis rates were 72.31% and 71.43% respectively, there was no significant difference between them (P 0.05). The misdiagnosis rate was as high as 80.28% in patients of first occurred symptoms in bulbar and upper limbs (n = 5), single upper limb (n = 49), single lower limb (n = 15), lateral limbs (n = 2). Most of misdiagnosed cases were patients with cervical spondylopathy, and cerebral vascular diseases. The misdiagnosis rate was 50.00% in Beijing, and 79.73% in other places, their difference was significant (P 0.05). Most of the misdiagnosed cases ( 80%) were found in basic hospitals, the final correct diagnosis were achieved in the teaching hospitals. Conclusion The main cause of misdiagnosis in ALS were the infrequent clinical characteristics of the disease and insufficient knowledge of doctors to the disease. Thus it is important to improve doctors' understanding of ALS and that is the most effective and essential measure for reducing misdiagnosis rate of ALS.
What problem does this paper attempt to address?