Efficacy and safety of rescue sedation of intranasal dexmedetomidine versus traditional rescue techniques for radiological scans in infants less than 12 months

Yong BIAN,Yi LU,Lihong JIN,Mazhong ZHANG,Yanhui HUANG

2016-01-01

Abstract:Objective To compare the efficacy and safety between intranasal dexmedetomidine and traditional sedative drugs for rescue sedation during radiological scans in infants less than 12 months.Methods Based on an intention to treat protocol,300 infants who underwent radiological scans but were not adequately sedated after initial oral dose of 50 mg/kg chloral hydrate between January 1at,2016 and March 28th,2016 were enrolled in this prospective single-blinded randomized clinical trial.They were randomly divided into three groups.Intramuscular phenobarbital 5 mg/kg,second oral chloral hydrate 25 mg/kg and intranasal dexmedetomidine1 μg/kg were given in the three groups,respectively.The efficacy and safety of sedation were evaluated based onthe onset time,wake-up time,total sedation time,scanning time,success rate of sedation,hemodynamic changes of oxygen saturation and clinical side-effects.Binary logistic regression analysis was used to evaluate influencing factors related to success rate of sedation.Results The sedation onset time in dexmedetomidine group was significantly shorter than that in chloral hydrate group (P＜0.01).The wake-up time and the total sedation time in dexmedetomidine group were significantly longer than those in phenobarbital group and chloral hydrate group (both P＜0.01).There were no significant differences in the scanning time between the groups (both P＞0.05).The success rates of rescue sedation were 83％,79％ and 90％ in phenobarbital group,chloral hydrate group and dexmedetomidine group,respectively (both P＞0.05).Heart rate (HR) from 5 min after administration to sedative recovery was significantly lower than those at baseline in the three groups (all P＜0.01),and HR from 10 min after administration to the end of the scanning was also significantly lower than those at 5 min after administration in the three groups (all P＜0.01).However,no significant differences were found in HR between groups or intra-group at each time point (all P ＞ 0.05).Saturation pulse oxygen (SpO2) from 5 min after administration to sedative recovery were significantly higher than those at baseline in the three groups (all P＜ 0.01).However,no significant differences were found in SpO2 between groups or intra-group at each time point (all P＞0.05).Also,no significant differences were found in the incidence of adverse reactions among three groups (both P＞0.05).No influencing factors were identified in the binary logistic regression models (all P＞0.05).Conclusion Intranasal dexmedetomidine can be used effectively and safely in infants less than 12 months during radiological scans as a rescue sedative.A dosage of dexmedetomidine 1 μg/kg will not increase the incidence of side effects and hemodynamic changes.