Abstract:[Objective] To evaluate the role of laparoscope assisted vaginal hysterectomy in the development of laparoscopic hysterectomy. [Methods] We conducted a retrospective analysis on 905 cases of hysterectomy, and divided the patients into four groups by different types of operations: group I:abdominal hysterectomy(AH, 383 cases); group II:Laparoscopic assisted vaginal hysterectomy(LAVH, 215 cases);group III :Laparoscopic subtotal hysterectomy/Classic Intrafascial Semm Hysterectomy(LSH/CISH, 188 cases); group IV: Total laparoscopic hysterectomy (TLH, 119 cases). We compared annually the number of cases in each group, the resulting complications, and cases that received laparoscopic hysterectomy but were switched to abdominal hysterectomy during laparoscopic operations from December 2002 to October 2005. We compared the operation time, blood loss, postoperative recovery, the hospitalization days after the operations and the hospitalization expenses between AH group and LAVH group in the first year. Meanwhile, we repeated the same comparisons in the last year. [Results] LAVH were first developed, and declined after the other laparoscopy types were conducted. There was no complication and no type switching during laparoscopy in LAVH group while other operating types had. Group Ⅱ has longer operation time, larger blood loss during operation, higher expenses, and shorter anus exhaust recovery time after operation than those in groupⅠduring the first year, and other comparisons showed no difference. The operation time in groupⅡ and the blood loss in group Ⅳ did not differ from that in groupⅠ during the last year, each laparoscopy group need higher expenses than that in groupⅠ, and others comparison between each laparoscopy group and groupⅠsuggests that laparoscopy is better. There is no difference about hospitalization expenses among each laparoscopy group, and in others comparison group Ⅲ are better than groupⅡ, and group Ⅳ does not differ from groupⅡexcept operation time, which is short in group Ⅳ. [Conclusions] LAVH is more preferable than others to initiate laparoscopic hysterectomy since it has a high success rate with low complications. Technically, LAVH helps surgeons familiarize the main points in performing laparoscopic hysterectomy, and thus extends the application of it.

Clinical Analysis of Laparoscopic Procedure in Treatment of 2700 Cases with Gynecologic Diseases

Clinical analysis of laparoscopic treatment for gallbladder aberrance

Clinical Analysis of Laparoscopic Resection of Colorectal Cancer

The Study of Indications to Gynecologic Tumor Treatment by Laparoscopy

Clinical Application and Evaluation of Video Laparoscopic Surgery in Urology

Clinical Analysis of Laparoscopic Cholecystectomy for Acute Cholecystitis

Treatment Effects of Laparoscopy Versus Laparotomy on Heterotopic Pregnancy after in Vitro Fertilization and Embryo Transfer.

Analysis of Complications about Gynecologic Endoscopic Procedures in 14 Hospitals of Shanghai During 1992-2001

[Analysis of the Complications of Gynecological Laparoscopic Operation Within 10 Years].

The Clinical Application of Lapowoscopy in Gynecology Diseases

Clinical Analysis of Laparoscopic Surgery in the Treatment of 32 Cases of Endometrial Cancer

Clinical analysis of 514 cases of laparoscopic assisted vaginal hysterectomy

Laparoscopy in Diagnosis and Treatment for the Acute Abdomen of Gynecology

Laparoscopic Surgery for Vaginal Endometriosis:a Clinical Analysis of 43 Cases

Cinical Analysis of 23 Cases of Conversion to Laparotomy during Gynecological Laparoscopic Surgery

Gynecological Laparoscopic Ambulatory Surgery: A Clinical Analysis of 62 Cases

Clinical study on combined general and gynecological laparoscopic surgery:a report of 68 cases

Role of laparoscope assisted vaginal hysterectomy in the development of laparoscopic gysterectomy

Clinical Analysis of Laparoscopically Assisted Vaginal Hysterectomy in Patients with Uterine Myoma or Severe Endometriosis

Analysis on the Factors Related to the Operative Efficacy of Laparoscopic Myomectomy