Abstract:Objective To evaluate the clinic efficacy, complication and prognosis of different interventional modalities in the treatment of large and giant intracranial aneurysms. Methods Between January 2001 and December 2010, 134 patients with large and giant intracranial aneurysms treated by endovascular approaches in the Department of Neurosurgery of Changhai Hospital were retrospectively analyzed. Of the 134 patients, 11 had been treated by parent artery occlusion, 20 by coil embolization, 78 by stent-assisted coil, and the rest 25 patients by Tubridge. Patients were followed up for 6~44 months after the procedure. Angiographic results were evaluated with Raymond grading system, whereas clinical outcomes were evaluated with the modified Rankin Scale (mRS). Favorable prognosis rate when discharge, the cure rate, the recurrence rate and favorable prognosis rate when follow-up, complication incidence were compared. Results The rate of favorable prognosis in the parent artery occlusion group was 100%, coil embolization group was 70.0%, stent-assisted coil embolization group was 91% and flow-diverter device group was 100%; the differences between groups are statistically significant (P=0.0030). At the time oflast follow-up, the cure rate of the parent artery occlusion group was 63.6%, coil embolization group was 5.6%, stent-assisted coil embolization group was 37.2% and flow-diverter device group was 72%; the differences between groups are statistically significant (P=0.0002). At the time of last follow-up, the recurrence rate of the parent artery occlusion group was 0%, coil embolization group was 83.3%, stentassisted coil embolization group was 30.8% and flow-diverter device group was 0%; the differences between groups are statistically significant (P<0.0001). The last follow-up favorable prognosis rate of the parent artery occlusion group was 100%, coil embolization group was 75%, stent-assisted coil embolization group was 90% and flow-diverter device group was 100%; the differences between groups are statistically significant (P=0.0209). The complication incidence of the parent artery occlusion group was 27.3%, coil embolization group was 30%, stent-assisted coil embolization group was 14.1% and flow-diverter device group was 0%; however, there were no statistical differences in the complication incidence between the four groups (P=0.0650). Conclusion Endovascular treatment of large or giant intracranial aneurysms is very challenging. Coil embolization is often associated with a very high recurrence rate, stent-assisted coil embolization can reduce the recurrence rate, parent artery occlusion gets satisfied favorable prognosis and recurrence rate, but the complication incidence is relatively high, the preliminary clinical results of flow diverter device appear to be satisfactory.

Comparative Study on Efficacy of Stent Retrieval and Stent Placement in the Treatment of Large Artery Occlusion due to Intracranial Atherosclerotic Disease

Endovascular Treatment for Acute Large Vessel Occlusion Due to Underlying Intracranial Atherosclerotic Disease

Study on the Difference of Response to Endovascular Recanalization Treatment of Large Vessel Occlusion: Intracranial Atherosclerosis versus Cardioembolism

Diagnosis and treatment of large intracranial artery stenosis and occlusion

Endovascular Recanalization for Intracranial Atherosclerotic Disease-Related Acute Large Artery Occlusion in Anterior Circulation

Intracranial stenting as a rescue therapy for acute anterior large vessel occlusive stroke after retrievable stent thrombectomy failure

Clinical study of endovascular treatment of acute ischemic stroke with combinedmechanical thrombectomy, intra-arterial thrombolysis and stenting

Management of acute tandem occlusions: Stent-retriever thrombectomy with emergency stenting or angioplasty.

Stent Angioplasty for Acute Intracranial Atherosclerotic Occlusion After Failed Thrombectomy: A Single-Institution Series of 55 Patients

Different Interventional Treatments of Large or Giant Intracranial Aneurysms:a Single Center Experience

Clinical Study of Endovascular Stenting for Intracranial Artery Stenosis

Clinical Study of Symptomatic Nonacute Intracranial Large Arterial Occlusion with Endovascular Recanalization

Primary Angioplasty and Stenting May Be Superior to Thrombectomy for Acute Atherosclerotic Large-Artery Occlusion

The curative effect Analysis of Endovascular Stenting for Stenosis of Internal Carotid artery

Endovascular Treatment of Acute Ischemic Stroke Due to Intracranial Atherosclerotic Large Vessel Occlusion

Value of endovascular stenting for symptomatic intracranial artery stenosis

Thirty-Day and One-Year Outcomes of Endovascular Treatments for Severe Atherosclerotic Stenosis of Intracranial ICA: Results From a Single Center

Comparision of Mechanical Thrombectomy With Contact Aspiration or Stent Retriever in Patients With Large-vessel Occlusion in Acute Ischemic Stroke

Aspiration Thrombectomy Versus Stent-Retriever Thrombectomy for the First-Pass Therapy of Intracranial Atherosclerosis-Related Large Vessel Occlusion: A Post Hoc Analysis of The Endovascular Treatment With Versus Without Tirofiban for Patients with Large Vessel Occlusion Stroke Trial

Comparison of Safety and Efficacy after Emergency Stenting in Patients Exhibiting Intracranial Atherosclerotic Stenosis Associated with Large-vessel Occlusion with and without Intravenous Infusion of Tirofiban

Single-Centre Experience with Endovascular Therapy in Acute Occlusion of ICAS