A comparative study of repetitive nerve stimulation and single-fiber electromyography neuromuscular junction disturbance in amyotrophic lateral sclerosis patients

Jie ZHANG,Liying CUI
DOI: https://doi.org/10.3969/j.issn.1006-2963.2016.05.005
2016-01-01
Abstract:Objective_ To investigate the consistency between repetitive nerve stimulation (RNS) and single‐fiber electromyography (SFEMG) in amyotrophic lateral sclerosis (ALS) and the relationship between RNS and fiber density (FD) ,trembling (jitter) ,block in SFEMG. Methods_From May 2008 to April 2009 ,43 ALS cases were diagnosed or suspected in the outpatient clinic or ward of Peking Union Medical College Hospital by SFEMG and RNS. The sensitivity and specificity of RNS and SFEMG were compared in neuromuscular disturbance diagnosis among the ALS patients. The correlation between the low frequency of RNS and jitter , block ,FD of SFEMG was analyzed. The results were analyzed using SPSS statistical software. Results_ (1) RNS was positive in 26 cases (60.5% ) ,and negative in 17 cases (39.5% ) . SFEMG was positive in 34 cases (79.1% ) ,and negative in 9 cases (20.9% ) . Both SFEMG and RNS were positive in 25 cases and both of them were negative in 8 cases. There was a significant consistency between RNS and SFEMG (Kappa= 0.47 , P<0.01) in ALS. (2) There was no significant difference of FD between the RNS negative and positive groups (t=-0.1405 , P> 0.05) . The abnormal levels of block and jitter in the RNS positive group were significantly higher than those in the RNS negative group (χ2 = 11.432 , P< 0.01 ;t= 2.906 , P< 0.01) . The RNS amplitude decrement of the radial nerve was positively correlated with the jitter value (r= 0.626 , P<0.05) . Conclusions_RNS and SFEMG have a good diagnostic agreement in ALS neuromuscular disturbance. Due to the high sensitivity ,simple operation ,low cost ,shorter time ,non‐invasive detection ,without special cooperation from patients ,operation in both proximal and distal muscles ,easy popularization ,RNS can be used for the diagnosis and follow‐up in ALS patients.
What problem does this paper attempt to address?