Efficiency of fingertip blood glucose combined with Chinese Diabetes Risk Score in screening diabetes mellitus and pre-diabetes

郭海健,胡浩,刘宇翔,陈亚玲,徐金水,沈征锴,沈雅,孙子林,王蓓
DOI: https://doi.org/10.3760/cma.j.issn.1674-5809.2020.02.004
2020-01-01
Abstract:Objective:To explore the value of fingertip capillary whole blood glucose (CBG) combined with Chinese Diabetes Risk Score (CDRS) in screening for type 2 diabetes mellitus (T2DM) and pre-diabetes [impaired fasting glucose (IFG) and impaired glucose tolerance (IGT)].Methods:From July to August 2018, 3 798 community residents from Jiangsu branch center of the study on evaluation of innovated screening tools and determination of optimal diagnostic cut-off points for type 2 diabetes in Chinese multi-ethnic(SENSIBLE study) were included. The fingertip fasting CBG (FCBG) and 2-hour CBG after glucose load (2 h-CBG) were measured. Oral glucose tolerance test (OGTT) was used as the "gold standard" for the diagnosis of T2DM or pre-diabetes. Receiver operating characteristic curve (ROC) was used to evaluate the cut-off point and the screening efficacy of CBG alone and combined CDRS.Results:(1) According to the World Health Organization(WHO) diagnostic criteria in 1999, the optimal cut-off point for screening T2DM by FCBG was 6.7 mmol/L, and 6.2 mmol/L when combined with CDRS (≥ 25). The sensitivity (specificity) of FCBG, CDRS (≥ 25) and FCBG+CDRS (≥ 25) were 79.48% (91.20%), 91.17%(27.56%) and 78.96%(78.22%), respectively. (2) The optimal cut-off point for screening IFG by FCBG was 6.0 mmol/L, and 6.1 mmol/L when combined with CDRS (≥ 25). The sensitivity (specificity) of the three methods were 82.31%(68.94%), 89.93%(27.53%) and 75.18%(74.11%), respectively. Compared with CDRS (≥ 25), the AUC of FCBG+CDRS (≥25) in screening for T2DM and IFG were increased by 32.3% and 27.1%, respectively. (3) The optimal cut-off point for IGT screening by 2 h-CBG was 8.2 mmol/L, and 8.5 mmol/L in combination with CDRS (≥25). The sensitivity (specificity) of 2 h-CBG, CDRS (≥ 25) and 2 h-CBG+CDRS (≥25) were 88.66%(76.04%), 84.85%(28.58%) and 80.67%(77.87%), respectively. Compared with CDRS (≥25), the AUC of 2 h-CBG+CDRS (≥25) in screening IGT was increased by 43.6%.Conclusions:CBG and CDRS are both effective tools for screening T2DM and pre-diabetes, and their combination can further improve the screening efficiency.
What problem does this paper attempt to address?