Abstract:Background: Insulin glargine is the first long-acting basal insulin analogue indicated for subcutaneous administration once daily at bedtime in adults with type 1 or type 2 diabetes mellitus and pediatric patients aged > or = 6 years with type 1 diabetes. It differs in structure from native human insulin by 3 amino acids, a structural modification that provides a delayed onset of action and a constant, peakless effect that has a duration of at least 24 hours. Objective: The goal of this article was to help determine the current place in therapy of insulin glargine by reviewing all available efficacy and tolerability data published since its introduction onto the market. Methods: Relevant English-language articles were identified through searches of MEDLINE, PubMed, and EMBASE from 1966 to October 2002 and PREMEDLINE for November 2002. The search terms used were insulin, analogs, analogues, diabetes mellitus, glargine, HOE901, HOE-901, efficacy, safety, comparative study, treatment outcome, and case report. The reference lists of the identified articles were searched for additional relevant publications. Pharmacokinetic and pharmacodynamic data were reviewed and summarized. All large clinical trials (> or = 100 patients) evaluating the efficacy and tolerability of insulin glargine in patients with type 1 or type 2 diabetes were included in the review. Studies were compared in terms of their designs, primary and secondary efficacy parameters (glycosylated hemoglobin [HbA(1c)], fasting plasma glucose [FPG] and/or fasting blood glucose [FBG] level, incidence of hypoglycemia), and tolerability assessments. Results: Fourteen trials met the criteria for inclusion in this review, 7 of them published only in abstract form. All were multicenter, randomized, open-label, parallel-group trials conducted in Europe or the United States, and ranged in duration from 4 to 52 weeks. They compared insulin glargine with neutral protamine Hagedorn (NPH) insulin given once or twice daily in >5000 patients with type 1 or type 2 diabetes, or in insulin-naive patients with type 2 diabetes that was poorly controlled by oral antidiabetic agents. Insulin doses were individually titrated to achieve a target FBG level < or =120 mg/dL (6.7 mmol/L). The studies were typically statistically underpowered to detect a significant difference in HbA(1c) between treatment groups; only 3 trials were of an adequate size to have 90% statistical power to detect a mean 0.5% difference in HbA(1c). Furthermore, analysis of the data from these trials was associated with a number of methodologic problems relating to inconsistencies in reporting. Given these limitations, the available data suggest that insulin glargine treatment produces statistically significant reductions in FPG or FBG levels at end point both compared with baseline and compared with NPH insulin (P < 0.001) without achieving overall significant improvements in HbA(1c) values. However, a recent abstract of a small 52-week trial in patients with type 1 diabetes reported a 0.4% additional decrease in HbA(1c) with insulin glargine treatment compared with NPH insulin. Patients have reported greater treatment satisfaction with insulin glargine compared with NPH insulin. The findings varied regarding weight gain, overall incidence of hypoglycemia, and incidence of nocturnal hypoglycemia. Currently, the cost of insulin glargine is twice that of NPH insulin on a per-unit basis. Conclusions: As a basal insulin replacement, insulin glargine administered once daily demonstrates a steady time-action profile over 24 hours without a pronounced peak. Based on the evidence from published clinical trials, insulin glargine appears to have equal clinical efficacy to NPH insulin, produces similar reductions in HbA(1c), and is associated with lower FPG and FBG levels and a consistent and significant reduction in the incidence of nocturnal hypoglycemia in patients with type 2 diabetes.

Efficacy and Safety of Glargine Insulin Injection Uslen Versus Lantus in Diabetic Patients: a Multicenter, Randomized, Open-Labeled Controlled Trial

Efficacy and Safety of Insulin Glargine Combined with Glimepiride in Type 2 Diabetic Patients with Poor Glycemic Control

Comparison of the Efficacy and Safety of Insulin Glulisine and Insulin Lispro Combined with Insulin Glargine in Patients with Diabetes

A randomised, open-labelstudy of insulin glargine or neutral protamine Hagedorn insulin in Chinese paediatric patients with type 1 diabetes mellitus

[Efficacy and safety of ultra rapid lispro in the treatment of type 2 diabetes mellitus: a randomized controlled clinical trial]

Efficacy and Safety of Additional Basal Insulin or Oral Antidiabetic Drug in Type 2 Diabetes Poorly Controlled with One Oral Antidiabetic Drug

Efficacy and Safety of LY2963016 Insulin Glargine Versus Insulin Glargine (lantus) in Chinese Adults with Type 2 Diabetes: A Phase III, Randomized, Open-Label, Controlled Trial

Immunogenicity, Efficacy, and Safety of Biosimilar Insulin Glargine (Gan & Lee Glargine) Compared With Originator Insulin Glargine (Lantus) in Patients With Type 1 Diabetes After 26 Weeks Treatment

Immunogenicity, efficacy, and safety of biosimilar insulin glargine (Gan & Lee glargine) compared with originator insulin glargine (Lantus®) in patients with type 2 diabetes after 26 weeks' treatment: A randomized open label study

[Efficacy and Safety of Changsulin® Compared with Lantus® in Type 2 Diabetes: a Phase Ⅲ Multicenter, Randomized, Open-Label, Parallel, Controlled Clinical Trial].

A Multicenter,randomized,open-Labelled,nph Parallel Controlled Study to Evaluate the Efficacy and Safety of Once Daily Injection of Glargine Combined with Glipizide GITS in the Treatment of Poor-Controled Type Ⅱ Diabetes Mellitus

Potential Value of the Asian Treat to Target Lantus Study（ ATLAS） for Type 2 Diabetes Management in China:safety and Efficacy of Two Treatment Algorithms Using Insulin Glargine

Comparison of efficacy and safety of Gansulin 30R and Novolin 30R in the treatment of type 2 diabetic patients: a multicenter randomized open controlled clinical trial

Short-term Cost-effectiveness of Liraglutide Versus Rosiglitazone、Glimepiride、Exenatide and Insulin Glargine in Chinese Patients with type 2 Diabetes

Meta-analysis of Glargine Combined with Glipizide Extended - Release Tablets in the Treatment of Type Ⅱ Diabetes Patients

COMPARATIVE EFFICACY AND SAFETY OF LIXISENATIDE AND INSULIN REGIMENS IN THE TREATMENT OF PATIENTS WITH TYPE 2 DIABETES MELLITUS INADEQUATELY CONTROLLED BY BASAL INSULIN: A SYSTEMATIC REVIEW AND NETWORK META-ANALYSIS

Efficacy and safety of insulin glargine 300 U/mL in people with type 2 diabetes in China: The INITIATION study

Comparison of the efficacy and safety of two kinds of mixed protamine Zinc recombinant human insulin lispro injection (50R) in the treatment of diabetes: a multicenter, randomized, parallel, positive controlled clinical trial

Efficacy and safety of lispro insulin treatment in patients with type 2 diabetes mellitus:a Meta-analysis

Comparison of Efficacy and Safety of Liraglutide and Glimepiride in Combination with Metformin in Type 2 Diabetes

Insulin glargine: a systematic review of a long-acting insulin analogue